City Municipal Government Client

R · Role Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/103#City_Municipal_Government_Client
Definition

The small municipal government retaining the engineer in dual capacity as part-time city engineer and fee-based design engineer. Has waived its right to independent review of the engineer's plans, effectively consenting to the self-review arrangement. Bears authority over project approval and engineering decisions.

Properties
Instance of
MunicipalGovernmentClient
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#MunicipalGovernmentClient
Attributes
entity_typeMunicipal government
retainer_structureMonthly retainer for advisory services plus fee-based design commissions
review_waiverHas waived right to independent review of engineer's own plans
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Relationships
typeconsented_to
targetDual capacity self-review arrangement
typeretains
targetEngineer Dual Capacity City Advisory Design
Role category
provider_client
Source Evidence
Source text
The client has such a right of review by its own engineer, but it may waive its right, as it has obviously done in this case

Text references
Canon 15 is not a bar to this type of arrangement because there is only one interested party (client) and that party has given its consent
The client has such a right of review by its own engineer, but it may waive its right, as it has obviously done in this case
TTL
@prefix case103: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/103#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case103:City_Municipal_Government_Client a proeth:MunicipalGovernmentClient, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "City Municipal Government Client" ; proeth:attributes "{'entity_type': 'Municipal government', 'retainer_structure': 'Monthly retainer for advisory services plus fee-based design commissions', 'review_waiver': \"Has waived right to independent review of engineer's own plans\"}" ; proeth:caseinvolvement "The small municipal government retaining the engineer in dual capacity as part-time city engineer and fee-based design engineer. Has waived its right to independent review of the engineer's plans, effectively consenting to the self-review arrangement. Bears authority over project approval and engineering decisions." ; proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ; proeth:confidence "0.9" ; proeth:discoveredincase "103" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-05-27T02:30:51.439346+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "103" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-05-27T02:30:51.439346+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:relationships "{'type': 'consented_to', 'target': 'Dual capacity self-review arrangement'}", "{'type': 'retains', 'target': 'Engineer Dual Capacity City Advisory Design'}" ; proeth:rolecategory "provider_client" ; proeth:roleclass "Municipal Government Client" ; proeth:sourcetext "The client has such a right of review by its own engineer, but it may waive its right, as it has obviously done in this case" ; proeth:textreferences "Canon 15 is not a bar to this type of arrangement because there is only one interested party (client) and that party has given its consent", "The client has such a right of review by its own engineer, but it may waive its right, as it has obviously done in this case" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 103 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-05-27T02:45:26.626372"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "claude-sonnet-4-6" ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 103 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
103
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-05-27T02:30:51.439346+00:00
First case
103
Generated
2026-05-27T02:30:51.439346+00:00
Attributed to
Case 103 Extraction
Generated
2026-05-27T02:45:26.626372
Attributed to
claude-sonnet-4-6
Generated by
ProEthica Case 103 Extraction