@prefix core: . @prefix owl: . @prefix pcsh: . @prefix proeth: . @prefix proeth-prov: . @prefix prov: . @prefix rdfs: . @prefix sh: . @prefix skos: . @prefix xsd: . proeth:ProfessionalTransparency a owl:Class ; rdfs:label "Professional Transparency" ; proeth:abstractNature "Requires contextual judgment about what information must be disclosed to whom, and at what stage of a professional process, to preserve trust and fairness in collegial relationships." ; proeth:confidence "0.91" ; proeth:derivedObligations "Decline to conduct covert review of a colleague's work", "Inform the original engineer of the scope and purpose of the review", "Notify the original engineer before commencing peer review" ; proeth:extensionalExamples "NSPE BER Case 94-7 on notification obligations when reviewing another engineer's work", "NSPE Code Section III.8 requiring engineers to notify the other party when asked to review another engineer's work" ; proeth:operationalization "Requires the reviewing engineer to notify the original design engineer before or at the outset of a peer review, and requires the client to permit such notification as a condition of the engagement." ; proeth:potentialConflicts "Confidentiality", "Loyalty" ; proeth:principleCategory "relational" ; proeth:textReferences "Engineer B objects to conducting the peer review without advising Engineer A", "Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know", "When Owner reluctantly consents to notifying Engineer A" ; proeth:valueBasis "Engineers whose work is subject to review have a legitimate professional interest in knowing that review is occurring, so they may respond, correct errors, or provide context." ; proeth-prov:discoveredInCase 15 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInPass 2 ; proeth-prov:discoveredInSection "facts" ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredAt "2026-06-02T19:55:30.891672+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; proeth-prov:firstDiscoveredInCase 15 ; proeth-prov:matchConfidence 0.88 ; proeth-prov:matchReasoning "The principle maps closely to the existing Transparency class in the ontology. The case instantiates transparency as the obligation to disclose to Engineer A that a peer review is being conducted, which is a direct application of the Transparency principle governing openness in professional conduct." ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyClass ; proeth-prov:matchedOntologyLabel "Transparency" ; proeth-prov:matchesExisting true ; proeth-prov:sourceText "Owner instructs Engineer B to conduct the peer review without letting Engineer A know" ; rdfs:comment "Relational principle requiring engineers to conduct professional activities openly and without concealment from affected colleagues, particularly when those activities involve evaluating or overseeing another engineer's work." ; rdfs:subClassOf proeth:RelationalPrinciple ; skos:definition "Relational principle requiring engineers to conduct professional activities openly and without concealment from affected colleagues, particularly when those activities involve evaluating or overseeing another engineer's work." ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-06-02T19:55:30.891672+00:00"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasAttributedTo "Case 15 Extraction", "claude-sonnet-4-6" . pcsh:CaseAnnotationShape a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Shared per-case annotation schema (all nine components)"@en ; rdfs:comment "The cross-component annotation fields on committed case individuals: proeth:confidence (extraction confidence, decimal; all components except Action, whose Step-3 contract carries no confidence field), proeth:textReferences (verbatim supporting quotes, universal), proeth-prov sourceText (the source snippet, on the Step-1/2 provenance layers; Step-3 A/E individuals ground via textReferences only), and the involvement gloss (proeth:caseInvolvement on role individuals, proeth:caseContext on obligation, capability, and constraint individuals). Values are per-individual; the fields do not individuate any type."@en ; sh:property [ sh:description "Extraction confidence for this individual (0 to 1)." ; sh:name "confidence" ; sh:order 1 ; sh:path proeth:confidence ], [ sh:description "Verbatim case quotes supporting this individual." ; sh:name "text references" ; sh:order 2 ; sh:path proeth:textReferences ], [ sh:description "How this individual figures in the case narrative (role individuals; the same text is routed into rdfs:comment)." ; sh:name "case involvement" ; sh:order 3 ; sh:path proeth:caseInvolvement ], [ sh:description "Grounding context in this case (obligation, capability, and constraint individuals)." ; sh:name "case context" ; sh:order 4 ; sh:path proeth:caseContext ] ; sh:targetClass core:Action, core:Capability, core:Constraint, core:Event, core:Obligation, core:Principle, core:Resource, core:Role, core:State . pcsh:PrincipleDefinitionShape a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Principle definition schema (type-level, descriptive, field contract)"@en ; rdfs:comment "What individuates a principle TYPE: its canonical kind (drives the four-kind subClassOf typing; the canonical leaf becomes the rdf:type) and the extensional cases that ground it (McLaren). The five per-case narrative literals and the invokedBy edge are per-individual and now declared on PrinciplePropertyShape, mirroring the RoleDefinitionShape/ProfessionalRolePropertyShape split so the {{ principle_schema }} prompt separates the type judgment from what the case supplies. Descriptive only (no validation result); principle_category is a routing input, not stored as a literal."@en ; sh:property [ sh:description "The controlled principle kind, which drives the four-kind subClassOf typing: FundamentalEthicalPrinciple, ProfessionalVirtuePrinciple, RelationalPrinciple, DomainSpecificPrinciple. The canonical leaf label becomes the rdf:type; the category is a routing input, not stored as a literal." ; sh:name "principle kind" ; sh:order 1 ; sh:path proeth:principleCategory ], [ sh:description "Class-level prior cases that instantiate the principle (McLaren extensional grounding); an optional class-mint field." ; sh:name "extensional cases" ; sh:order 2 ; sh:path proeth:extensionalCases ] ; sh:targetClass core:Principle . pcsh:PrinciplePropertyShape a sh:NodeShape ; rdfs:label "Principle per-case schema (individual data, non-definitional)"@en ; rdfs:comment "What a principle INDIVIDUAL is described by in a specific case: the five narrative literals the defeasibility pipeline consumes and the agent that invokes it. These do NOT individuate the principle TYPE (that is PrincipleDefinitionShape); their values are per-case, asserted on the individual. Descriptive only."@en ; sh:property [ sh:description "Per-case reading of what the principle requires in this situation (a defeasibility-pipeline source field)." ; sh:name "interpretation" ; sh:order 1 ; sh:path proeth:interpretation ], [ sh:description "How the principle is concretely expressed in the case (a defeasibility-pipeline source field)." ; sh:name "concrete expression" ; sh:order 2 ; sh:path proeth:concreteExpression ], [ sh:description "What the principle is applied to in the case (the situation or party it bears on)." ; sh:name "applied to" ; sh:order 3 ; sh:path proeth:appliedTo ], [ sh:description "The competing principle or value this principle is balanced against in the case, recorded as a literal; extraction records the tension but asserts no defeat or precedence, and the defeasibility edges are materialized by a separate pass from this field." ; sh:name "balancing with" ; sh:order 4 ; sh:path proeth:balancingWith ], [ sh:description "How the case resolves the tension involving this principle (a defeasibility-pipeline source field)." ; sh:name "tension resolution" ; sh:order 5 ; sh:path proeth:tensionResolution ], [ sh:description "The agent who invokes the principle, via the P->Agent invokedBy edge (resolved to a case Agent by embedding shortlist + LLM select; a Board-pattern invoking party resolves deterministically to the case-scoped NSPE Board of Ethical Review Agent). Range: Agent." ; sh:name "invoked by" ; sh:order 6 ; sh:path core:invokedBy ] ; sh:targetClass core:Principle .