ProEthica Case 72 Ontology
type: Ontology
created: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.960989
imports: intermediate

60-Day Notice Received
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.996840
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

60-Day Notice Received → Hiring Engineer Doe
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.997288
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Adverse Finding Communication Competency
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings
source text facts: Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings
definition: The professional skill to communicate unfavorable technical conclusions to clients in a clear, professional manner while maintaining ethical obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.699694
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Adverse Findings Possession State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
definition: A state where a professional possesses knowledge of findings that are unfavorable to their client's interests or position, creating tension between client loyalty and professional/public duties
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.754995
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Adverse Professional Finding State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
definition: A state where a professional has reached conclusions through their expert analysis that are unfavorable to their client's interests or desired outcomes
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.982666
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Adverse Professional Findings State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
definition: A state where a professional has reached conclusions through proper investigation that are unfavorable to the client's interests or desired outcomes
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.948648
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Applicable_Environmental_Safety_Standards
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated... it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated... it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.742063
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Board_Code_Interpretation
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code
source text discussion: We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.702093
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Case 72 Timeline
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.997743
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Client Confidentiality Boundary
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings
source text facts: Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings
definition: Constraint limiting disclosure of information obtained through professional engagement to third parties
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.712646
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Client Suppression of Professional Documentation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
definition: A state where a client actively instructs or pressures a professional to withhold, suppress, or not produce written documentation of professional findings, particularly when those findings may have public safety implications
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.949092
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Code Interpretation Competence
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We interpret 'plans and specifications' in this section to include all engineering instruments of service.
source text discussion: We interpret 'plans and specifications' in this section to include all engineering instruments of service.
definition: The ability to interpret professional codes of ethics in context, understanding how specific provisions apply to novel situations and how narrow provisions should be read in light of broader professional principles
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.702681
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Code_Section_1
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 1-'The Engineer will be guided in all his professional relations by the highest standards of integrity, and will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'
source text discussion: Section 1-'The Engineer will be guided in all his professional relations by the highest standards of integrity, and will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.961278
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Code_Section_2a
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 2(a)- 'He will regard his duty to the public welfare as paramount.'
source text discussion: Section 2(a)- 'He will regard his duty to the public welfare as paramount.'
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.967078
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Code_Section_2c
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code. That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities' is particularly pertinent
source text discussion: We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code. That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities' is particularly pertinent
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.967935
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Code_Section_7
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 7-'The Engineer will not disclose confidential information concerning the business affairs or technical processes of any present or former client or employer without his consent.'
source text discussion: Section 7-'The Engineer will not disclose confidential information concerning the business affairs or technical processes of any present or former client or employer without his consent.'
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.968666
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Confidentiality Boundary Assessment
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority...will not be disclosing the technical processes
source text discussion: Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority...will not be disclosing the technical processes
definition: The competency to distinguish between protected confidential information and information that must be disclosed in the public interest, enabling appropriate disclosure without violating confidentiality obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.703147
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Confidentiality_Case76-4_Discussion
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes or business affairs of the client.
source text discussion: Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes or business affairs of the client.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.734140
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Confidentiality Limitation
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes
source text discussion: Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes
definition: Constraint that restricts disclosure of client business affairs and technical processes, but does not extend to matters affecting public safety
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.713050
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Confidentiality_XYZCase_ClientTermination
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.734551
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Confrontation with Public Safety Obligation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
definition: A state where a professional becomes aware of circumstances that directly invoke their paramount duty to protect public safety, health, and welfare, requiring them to take action beyond normal client service
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.949523
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Payment Completion
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.998239
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination Completion
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.959779
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination Completion → Present Contradictory Environmental Data
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.960222
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination Decision
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.998815
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination Decision → False Compliance Presentation
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.999413
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination and Report Prohibition
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.960927
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination with Conditions State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
definition: A state where a professional's engagement has been terminated by the client with specific conditions attached, particularly conditions that may affect the professional's ability to fulfill ongoing ethical obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.984200
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contract Termination with Suppression Intent State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
source text facts: Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
definition: A state where a professional's engagement has been terminated specifically to prevent disclosure of unfavorable findings, creating tension between contractual obligations and professional duties
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.949996
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contractual Service Boundary
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract
definition: Constraint defined by the terms of the engineering services contract that limits the scope and continuation of professional engagement
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.713487
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contractual Service Termination
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
definition: Constraint on professional's ability to continue work or deliver products when client terminates engagement
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.713909
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contradictory Data Presentation
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.767894
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Contradictory Data Presentation → Ethical Obligations Triggered
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.768234
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Corporate Client
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted
definition: Business organization that retains engineering professionals to conduct studies and provide technical services, with authority to direct scope of work within contractual bounds
definition: Business organization that retains engineering professionals under contract to perform technical services, studies, or assessments, with authority to direct scope of work and terminate contracts
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.943716
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Corporate Environmental Compliance Data
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text: [facts] the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
definition: Technical data and documentation prepared by corporations to demonstrate compliance with environmental regulations and standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.969325
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Corporate Environmental Permit Applicant
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
source text facts: The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
definition: Corporate entity required by regulatory authority to apply for environmental discharge permits and demonstrate compliance with established environmental standards
definition: Corporate entity seeking regulatory permits for environmental discharges, responsible for demonstrating compliance with environmental standards to regulatory authorities
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.979129
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Costly-Corrective-Action-Resource-Constraint
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly
source text facts: He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.714315
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_DOCUMENTATION_OBLIGATION
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.721994
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_DUTY_OF_CARE_ENVIRONMENTAL
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.722393
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_DUTY_TO_REPORT_PUBLIC_HEARING
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view
source text facts: Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.722863
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_ENVIRONMENTAL_DISCLOSURE_OBLIGATION
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.723441
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_FIDUCIARY_DUTY_TO_CLIENT
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.723960
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_PREVENT_DECEPTION_OBLIGATION
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.724424
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

DOE_PROFESSIONAL_INDEPENDENCE_OBLIGATION
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
source text facts: instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.724843
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Discharge-Quality-Standard
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.714734
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Discharge Violations Discovered
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.768573
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-Confidentiality-PublicSafety-Exception
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes or business affairs
source text discussion: the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes or business affairs
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.715150
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-Contract-Termination-Boundary
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.715546
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-Contract-Termination-Restriction
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
source text facts: terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.715942
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-Non-Deception-Public-Hearing
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.716498
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-Scope-of-Practice-Limitation
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.716994
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-UnprofessionalConduct-Prohibition
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.717474
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe-UnsafePlans-Prohibition
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We interpret 'plans and specifications' in this section to include all engineering instruments of service.
source text discussion: We interpret 'plans and specifications' in this section to include all engineering instruments of service.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.718003
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_AdverseFindings_WaterQuality
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Core finding that triggered contract termination and created ethical dilemma about disclosure
case involvement: Created the central ethical dilemma when XYZ terminated contract to suppress findings
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.950408
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_AdverseFindings_XYZDischarge
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Directly triggered XYZ's decision to terminate Doe's contract and suppress findings
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.984941
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Adverse_Communication_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings
source text facts: Doe verbally advises the XYZ Corporation of his findings
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.703570
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Client_Advice_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.725236
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Confidentiality_Boundary_Assessment
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not...be disclosing the technical processes
source text discussion: the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not...be disclosing the technical processes
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.703991
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Confidentiality_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing
source text discussion: Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.725639
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Confrontation_Public_Safety_Hearing
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: This state transforms Doe's situation from completed client engagement to active ethical obligation requiring further action
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.950875
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Consulting_Report_XYZ_Discharge
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report... After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report... instructs Doe not to render a written report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report... After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report... instructs Doe not to render a written report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.969958
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_ContractTerminationSuppression_XYZ
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Created the central ethical dilemma - whether Doe should disclose despite termination instructions
source text: [facts] Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
source text facts: Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.951422
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_ContractTerminationWithConditions_XYZCorporation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Business mechanism used to attempt to limit Doe's professional obligations
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.985542
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Cost_Assessment_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly
source text facts: He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.704430
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Environmental_Assessment_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.704827
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Environmental_Assessment_XYZ_Discharge
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report... After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report... After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.742493
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Environmental_Impact_Report_Unpublished
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report... After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report... instructs Doe not to render a written report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report... After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report... instructs Doe not to render a written report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.932157
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_FaithfulAgentDuty_XYZCorporation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Doe fulfilled this obligation by verbally advising XYZ of the standards violation
source text: [discussion] In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.986124
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_FaithfulAgentFulfilled_XYZAdvice
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Doe satisfied his duty to client, which now allows focus on higher public duties
source text: [discussion] In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.755947
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Faithful_Agent_Advisory
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.705211
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Faithful_Agent_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.726039
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Faithful_Agent_Status_XYZ
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Doe fulfilled his faithful agent duties by verbally advising XYZ of the standards violation before contract termination
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.951928
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_KnowledgeMisrepresentation_PublicHearing
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Escalated ethical dilemma - Doe now knows misleading information is being used in regulatory proceeding
source text: [facts] Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
source text facts: Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.952397
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Knowledge_Standards_Violation_XYZ
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Doe's professional knowledge that standards will be violated is the foundation of his ethical obligations throughout the case
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.952825
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_MisleadingProceeding_PublicHearing
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Escalated the ethical dilemma by adding public proceeding dimension to suppressed findings
source text: [facts] Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
source text facts: Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.756523
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_ParamountPublicDuty_HearingDiscovery
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Hearing triggers Doe's confrontation with paramount public duty, requiring action
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare. Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare. Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.756975
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Post_Termination_Ethical_Judgment
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing
source text facts: Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.705614
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Professional_Licensing_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.706059
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Professional_Reporting_Judgment
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.706502
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Proper_Authority_Notification
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest
source text discussion: the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.707023
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_PublicHearingAwareness_XYZMatter
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Triggering event that 'squarely confronts' Doe with his public obligations
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.986705
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_PublicSafetyAwareness_StandardsViolation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Doe's awareness of safety violations creates obligation to act despite contract termination
source text: [discussion] In this case, it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: In this case, it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.757419
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Public_Safety_Recognition
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.707610
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Public_Welfare_Paramount_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.726456
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_RegulatoryNonComplianceDiscovery_XYZProject
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Foundation of the ethical issue - Doe's discovery triggers all subsequent obligations
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.987423
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Report_Unprofessional_Conduct_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c).
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.726905
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Report_Writing_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
source text facts: instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.708097
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Standards_Assessment
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text discussion: the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.708545
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_SuppressedKnowledge_WaterQuality
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Creates the central ethical dilemma - Doe possesses knowledge relevant to public hearing but was instructed not to document it
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.988028
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_SuppressedOpinion_XYZCorporation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Central ethical dilemma - Doe's professional opinion is being suppressed while public safety is at risk
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.757878
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_SuppressedReport_XYZCorporation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Central ethical dilemma - creates tension between client instruction and public safety obligation
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.988556
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_SuppressedReport_XYZDischarge
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Created the ethical question of whether Doe has obligation to disclose despite client instruction
source text: [facts] Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
source text facts: Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.758323
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Take_Action_Protect_Public_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.727300
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Technical_Conclusion_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.708955
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_UnprofessionalConductRequest_XYZCorporation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Board's interpretation that inaction by Doe would itself constitute unprofessional conduct
source text: [discussion] We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.989116
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_UnprofessionalConductRequest_XYZNoReport
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Board interprets XYZ's actions as triggering Section 2(c) reporting obligations
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c).
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.758781
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Unprofessional_Conduct_Recognition
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.709355
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_Whistleblowing_Judgment_Capability
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.709762
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe_XYZ_Engineering_Services_Contract
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.970570
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Doe's verbal advice before contract termination
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.961333
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty of Professional Independence
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
definition: Obligation requiring professionals to maintain independence in professional judgment and not allow client termination or payment to suppress truthful findings or prevent completion of professional work product
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.728197
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty to Advise on Project Viability
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] He will advise his client or employer when he believes a project will not be successful.
source text discussion: He will advise his client or employer when he believes a project will not be successful.
definition: Obligation requiring engineers to advise clients or employers when they believe a project will not be successful or will violate standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.728881
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty to Complete Professional Documentation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality
definition: Obligation requiring professionals to document and preserve findings in written form, particularly when those findings have public safety or regulatory implications
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.729419
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty to Disclose Environmental Harm
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
definition: Obligation requiring professionals to report findings that indicate potential environmental damage or violations of environmental standards to appropriate authorities, even when such disclosure conflicts with client interests
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.729918
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty to Prevent Public Deception
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
definition: Obligation requiring professionals to take action when they have knowledge that their client is presenting false or misleading information to public authorities or the public
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.730438
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty to Refuse Unsafe Designs
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] He will not complete, sign or seal plans and/or specifications that are not of a design safe to the public health and welfare
source text discussion: He will not complete, sign or seal plans and/or specifications that are not of a design safe to the public health and welfare
definition: Obligation requiring engineers to not complete, sign, or seal plans and specifications that are not safe to public health and welfare
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.730936
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Duty to Report Unprofessional Conduct Requests
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities'
source text discussion: That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities'
definition: Obligation requiring engineers to report any client or employer request for unprofessional conduct to proper authorities
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.731438
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineer_General_Public_Safety_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] the paramount duty of the engineer is to protect the public safety, health and welfare in a broad context
source text discussion: the paramount duty of the engineer is to protect the public safety, health and welfare in a broad context
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.732017
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineer_Notify_Authorities_Obligation
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] He will notify the proper authority of any observed conditions which endanger public safety and health.
source text discussion: He will notify the proper authority of any observed conditions which endanger public safety and health.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.732481
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Historical
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.' ... Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text: [discussion] Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'... Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount... We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code.
source text discussion: Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.' ... Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text discussion: Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'... Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount... We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.972325
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Section1
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'
source text discussion: Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.933857
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Section1c
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.934317
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Section2
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] That particular reference must be read in light of the overall thrust of §§2 and 2(a), both of which indicate clearly that the paramount duty of the engineer is to protect the public safety, health and welfare
source text discussion: That particular reference must be read in light of the overall thrust of §§2 and 2(a), both of which indicate clearly that the paramount duty of the engineer is to protect the public safety, health and welfare
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.934767
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Section2a
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text discussion: Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.935169
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Section2c
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code. That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities' is particularly pertinent
source text discussion: We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code. That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities' is particularly pertinent
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.935707
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering_Code_of_Ethics_Section7
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes or business affairs of the client.
source text discussion: Section 7 of the code does not give us pause because the action of the engineer in advising proper authority of the apparent danger to the public interest will not in this case be disclosing the technical processes or business affairs of the client.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.936275
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering Consultant
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
definition: Professional engineer retained by a client organization to conduct independent studies, assessments, and provide expert technical opinions on compliance with established standards and regulations
definition: Professional engineer retained by a client organization to conduct studies, provide technical assessments, and render professional opinions on engineering matters, operating under a services contract with defined scope and deliverables
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.945393
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering Consulting Report
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
definition: Detailed technical report prepared by a consulting engineer documenting findings, analysis, and conclusions from professional engineering studies
definition: Formal written technical report prepared by a consulting engineer documenting findings, analysis, and conclusions from professional engineering studies
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.971110
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering Services Contract
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
source text discussion: The termination of Doe's contract with full payment for services rendered is a business decision which we will presume is permitted by the terms of the engineering services contract between Doe and his client.
definition: A legal agreement between an engineer and client that defines the scope of services, deliverables, payment terms, and conditions for engineering work
definition: A legal agreement between an engineer and client that defines the scope of services, deliverables, payment terms, and conditions governing the professional relationship
definition: A legal agreement between an engineer and client that defines the scope of services, deliverables, payment terms, and conditions of the professional engagement
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.971693
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineering Standards Compliance Consultant
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
definition: Professional engineer retained to conduct studies and provide expert assessment on whether projects, facilities, or operations meet established legal and regulatory standards, with particular responsibility for advising clients on compliance status and potential violations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.980247
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Consulting Engineer
type: EnvironmentalConsultingEngineer
type: NamedIndividual
match confidence: 0.8
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
definition: Professional engineer retained to perform independent technical studies and provide expert analysis on environmental impacts, specifically assessing whether industrial discharges meet regulatory standards for water quality
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.980976
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Discharge Permit Application
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water
definition: Official regulatory document required for organizations seeking authorization to discharge manufacturing or industrial wastes into bodies of water
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.972907
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Harm Risk State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
definition: A state where professional analysis has identified that an action or condition will cause environmental degradation below established standards, creating public welfare protection obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.759212
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Impact Assessment Competency
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
definition: The technical and analytical ability to evaluate how industrial discharges affect receiving water bodies and compare results against established environmental standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.710147
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Impact Assessment Report
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
definition: Technical engineering report analyzing the environmental effects of industrial activities, particularly discharge impacts on receiving environments
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.744394
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Protection
type: EnvironmentalProtection
type: NamedIndividual
match confidence: 0.8
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
definition: Principle that engineers have an ethical duty to protect the natural environment and prevent harm to ecological systems, even when this conflicts with client interests or contractual relationships
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.734950
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Quality Standards
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text: [facts] XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the receiving body of water after receiving the manufacturing wastes will still meet established environmental standards
source text facts: XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the receiving body of water after receiving the manufacturing wastes will still meet established environmental standards
definition: Established regulatory standards defining minimum acceptable quality levels for environmental resources such as water bodies
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.973445
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Standard Threshold
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met
source text facts: XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met
definition: Physical/legal constraint defining minimum acceptable environmental quality levels that cannot be exceeded
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.718632
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Standards Violation Risk State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
definition: A state where professional analysis indicates that an activity will cause environmental conditions to fall below legally established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.953314
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Environmental Standards Violation State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
definition: A state where an entity's activities have been determined by professional analysis to cause environmental conditions to fall below legally established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.989671
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Established Environmental/Safety Standards
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
definition: Legal or regulatory standards established by law that define minimum requirements for public health, safety, or environmental protection
definition: Legal or regulatory standards establishing minimum requirements for environmental quality, public health, or safety that engineering work must meet
definition: Legally mandated minimum standards established by law for environmental protection, public health, and safety that engineering work must comply with
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.973984
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Established_Legal_Standards_XYZ_Case
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated... it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated... it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.939702
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Established_Standards_Violated
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated... a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated... a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.974536
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Ethical Obligations Triggered
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.768938
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Ethics_Board_Case_67_10
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] As we noted in Case No. 67-10, even though involving unrelated facts and circumstances, 'It is basic to the entire concept of a profession that its members will devote their interests to the public welfare, as is made abundantly clear in §2 and §2(a) of the code.'
source text discussion: As we noted in Case No. 67-10, even though involving unrelated facts and circumstances, 'It is basic to the entire concept of a profession that its members will devote their interests to the public welfare, as is made abundantly clear in §2 and §2(a) of the code.'
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.975554
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Ethics Board Case Precedent
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] As we noted in Case No. 67-10, even though involving unrelated facts and circumstances, 'It is basic to the entire concept of a profession that its members will devote their interests to the public welfare'
source text discussion: As we noted in Case No. 67-10, even though involving unrelated facts and circumstances, 'It is basic to the entire concept of a profession that its members will devote their interests to the public welfare'
definition: Prior decisions and interpretations issued by professional ethics boards that establish precedent for interpreting ethical codes and standards in similar situations
definition: Prior decisions and interpretations issued by professional ethics boards that establish precedent for interpreting ethical codes in similar situations
definition: Prior decisions and interpretations issued by professional ethics boards that serve as precedent for interpreting ethical codes in subsequent cases
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.975056
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

FaithfulAgency_Case76-4_Discussion
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.' In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.' In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.735840
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Faithful Agency
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The Engineer will be guided in all his professional relations by the highest standards of integrity, and will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.
source text discussion: The Engineer will be guided in all his professional relations by the highest standards of integrity, and will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.
definition: Principle that engineers must act as loyal representatives serving their clients' or employers' legitimate interests with integrity and trustworthiness
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.735401
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Faithful Agent Duty
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The Engineer will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.
source text discussion: The Engineer will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.
definition: Obligation requiring engineers to act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee, maintaining highest standards of integrity
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.732904
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Faithful Agent Obligation Fulfilled State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
definition: A state where a professional has satisfied their duty to act as a faithful agent or trustee to their client by providing appropriate advice, even if that advice is unwelcome
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.759672
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

False Compliance Presentation
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.002357
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Hire Environmental Consulting Engineer
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.961725
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Hire Environmental Consulting Engineer → Standards Violation Discovery
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.962073
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Hiring Engineer Doe
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.002996
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Hiring Engineering Consultant
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.769309
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Honesty_Case76-4_Discussion
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
source text discussion: In this spirit Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated. His verbal advice to the corporation would seem to meet the letter and spirit of §§1 and 1(c).
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.736247
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Honesty_XYZCase_CorporateMisrepresentation
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.738047
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Knowledge of Misrepresentation to Authority State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
source text facts: Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
definition: A state where a professional possesses knowledge that contradicts information being presented to regulatory authorities by another party
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.953793
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Knowledge of Standards Violation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
definition: A state where a professional has determined through their professional judgment and studies that established legal or regulatory standards are being or will be violated, creating potential public harm
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.954232
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Loyalty_XYZCase_ClientRelationship
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
source text facts: Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.738664
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Misleading Public Proceeding State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
source text facts: Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
definition: A state where a professional becomes aware that misleading or incomplete information is being presented in a public regulatory proceeding, triggering potential disclosure obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.760099
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Misleading Regulatory Submission State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
definition: A state where an entity has presented data or information to regulatory authorities that contradicts known professional findings or misrepresents actual conditions
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.990233
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Objectivity_XYZCase_TechnicalFindings
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: After completion of his studies but before completion of any written report, Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.739138
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Paramount Public Duty Activation State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare. Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare. Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
definition: A state where circumstances have elevated the professional's duty to the public above other professional obligations, requiring action to protect public safety, health, or welfare
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.760507
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Permit Deadline Activation
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.962500
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Permit Deadline Activation → Hire Environmental Consulting Engineer
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.962944
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Permit Deadline Imposed
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.769901
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Permit Deadline Imposed → Hiring Engineering Consultant
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.770417
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Post-Engagement Ethical Judgment Competency
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report
definition: The ethical reasoning ability to determine appropriate professional conduct after a client relationship has been terminated, particularly regarding information obtained during engagement
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.710569
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Present Contradictory Environmental Data
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.963342
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

ProfessionalAccountability_XYZCase_PublicHearing
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: Thereafter, Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.739553
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Professional Engineering Code of Ethics
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'
source text discussion: Section 1 of the code is clear in providing that the engineer 'will act in professional matters for each client or employer as a faithful agent or trustee.'
definition: A comprehensive ethical code governing the professional conduct, duties, and obligations of engineers, including responsibilities to clients, employers, and the public
definition: A formal code document establishing ethical standards, duties, and professional conduct requirements for engineers, including obligations to clients, employers, and the public
definition: A formal document establishing ethical standards, duties, and professional conduct requirements for engineers, including obligations to clients, employers, and the public
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.976081
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Professional Reporting Judgment
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
definition: The competency to determine when, how, and in what format professional findings should be documented and communicated, including the ability to recognize when requests to alter reporting practices may constitute unprofessional conduct
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.710991
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

PublicSafety_Case76-4_Discussion
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare. Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare. Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.740406
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

PublicWelfare_Case76-4_Discussion
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We interpret 'plans and specifications' in this section to include all engineering instruments of service. That particular reference must be read in light of the overall thrust of §§2 and 2(a), both of which indicate clearly that the paramount duty of the engineer is to protect the public safety, health and welfare in a broad context.
source text discussion: We interpret 'plans and specifications' in this section to include all engineering instruments of service. That particular reference must be read in light of the overall thrust of §§2 and 2(a), both of which indicate clearly that the paramount duty of the engineer is to protect the public safety, health and welfare in a broad context.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.740809
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Contradiction Exposure
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.963715
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Disclosure
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
definition: Principle that engineers have an ethical duty to ensure that accurate technical information reaches appropriate authorities and the public, particularly when public welfare or environmental protection is at stake
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.739988
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public_Health_Safety_Risk_XYZ_Operations
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: The presumed failure to meet minimum standards established by law is deemed detrimental to public health and safety, forming the basis for Doe's paramount public duty
source text: [discussion] In this case, it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: In this case, it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.954743
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Hearing Awareness State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
source text discussion: Upon learning of the hearing, he is squarely confronted with his obligations to the public concerning its safety, health, and welfare.
definition: A state where a professional becomes aware of a public proceeding or hearing related to matters on which they possess relevant professional knowledge, triggering consideration of disclosure obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.990781
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Hearing Convened
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.003590
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Hearing Record
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view
source text facts: Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view
definition: Official documentation and proceedings from regulatory public hearings where stakeholders present data and testimony on environmental or regulatory matters
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.976582
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Hearing Submission
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
definition: Data and documentation submitted by organizations to regulatory authorities during public hearings on environmental matters
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.748930
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Interest Whistleblowing Judgment Competency
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view
source text facts: Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view
definition: The ethical and analytical competency to evaluate when professional knowledge of potential public harm creates an obligation to disclose information despite confidentiality constraints
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.711398
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Safety Endangerment Awareness State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] In this case, it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: In this case, it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
definition: A state where a professional has become aware of conditions or circumstances that endanger public safety, health, or welfare, triggering heightened professional obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.760924
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Public Welfare Paramount Duty
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
source text discussion: Section 2(a) requires that his duty to the public be paramount.
definition: Obligation requiring engineers to regard their duty to public welfare as paramount above all other professional considerations including client interests
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.733317
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Regulatory Authority
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code.
source text discussion: We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code.
definition: Governmental or professional body with jurisdiction to conduct hearings, interpret professional codes of ethics, and receive reports of unprofessional conduct or public safety concerns from engineers
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.946281
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Regulatory Compliance Analysis Competency
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
definition: The analytical ability to interpret regulatory requirements, permit conditions, and minimum standards to assess whether industrial operations meet legal environmental thresholds
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.711805
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Regulatory Compliance Deadline
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
definition: Temporal constraint imposed by regulatory authority requiring action within specified timeframe
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.719055
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Regulatory Compliance Deadline State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water.
source text facts: The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water.
definition: A state where an organization faces a time-bound regulatory requirement to obtain permits or meet compliance standards, creating urgency for action and decision-making
definition: A state where an organization faces a time-bound regulatory requirement with specific deadlines for compliance actions, creating urgency and constraining available options
definition: A state where an organization is under a time-bound regulatory requirement to submit documentation or take action to comply with governmental authority mandates
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.991349
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Regulatory Non-Compliance Discovery State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
source text discussion: Engineer Doe has advised the XYZ Corporation that the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated.
definition: A state where a professional has discovered through their work that established legal or regulatory standards will be or are being violated by a client or project
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.991846
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Request for Unprofessional Conduct
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c).
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c).
definition: A state where a client or employer has made a request or instruction that constitutes unprofessional conduct under professional ethics codes, triggering reporting obligations
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.955542
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Standards Violation Discovery
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.964115
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

State_Authority_Public_Hearing_XYZ_Discharge
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.977080
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

State_Minimum_Discharge_Standards
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.977569
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

State_Pollution_Control_Permit_Notice_XYZ
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.978036
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

State_Water_Quality_Minimum_Standards
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: XYZ is also advised of the minimum standard that must be met... the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.749696
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Suppressed Professional Knowledge State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
source text facts: the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation
definition: A state where a professional possesses material information relevant to public welfare or regulatory proceedings that has been deliberately prevented from formal documentation or disclosure
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.992397
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Suppressed Professional Opinion State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
definition: A state where a professional's technical findings or opinions are being actively suppressed or prevented from being documented by a client or employer, creating tension between contractual obligations and professional duties
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.763988
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Suppressed Report State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text: [facts] Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text facts: Subsequently, the corporation terminates the contract with Doe with full payment for services performed, and instructs Doe not to render a written report to the corporation.
definition: A state where a professional has been instructed by a client or employer to withhold or not produce a written report or documentation of findings, particularly when those findings have safety or compliance implications
definition: A state where a professional's findings or report have been deliberately prevented from being formalized or disclosed by the client, creating ongoing ethical obligations regarding the suppressed information
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.992903
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Unprofessional Conduct Recognition
type: Capability
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action
source text discussion: We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action
definition: The ability to identify when client or employer requests constitute unprofessional conduct that requires reporting to proper authorities, including recognizing subtle forms of pressure to compromise professional standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.712207
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Unprofessional Conduct Request State
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c). We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text: [discussion] We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c). We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
definition: A state where a professional has received a request or instruction from a client or employer that constitutes unprofessional conduct, triggering reporting obligations
definition: A state where a professional has received a request or instruction from a client that constitutes or would require unprofessional conduct, triggering reporting obligations to proper authorities
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.993503
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Verbal Advice Only
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.004077
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Verbal Advice Only → False Compliance Presentation
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.004529
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Verbal Disclosure of Findings
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.964475
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Verbal Disclosure of Findings → Contract Termination and Report Prohibition
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.964823
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Verbal Findings Report
type: Action
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.770866
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Verbal Findings Report → Contract Termination Decision
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.771270
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Violation Standards Discovery
type: Event
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.005034
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Violation Standards Discovery → Contract Termination Decision
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.005472
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

WhistleblowingDuty_Case76-4_Discussion
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c). We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c). We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.741656
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Whistleblowing Duty
type: Principle
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities' is particularly pertinent in the situation before us.
source text discussion: That portion of §2(c) which requires the engineer to report any request for 'unprofessional' conduct to 'proper authorities' is particularly pertinent in the situation before us.
definition: Principle that engineers have an affirmative obligation to report unprofessional conduct and dangers to public safety to proper authorities when internal channels fail
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.741236
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Written Documentation Restriction
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
definition: Client-imposed constraint prohibiting the engineer from producing written reports or formal documentation of findings
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.719486
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ-60-Day-Permit-Deadline
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water
source text facts: it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.721191
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ-NoWrittenReport-Stipulation
type: Constraint
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [discussion] the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report
source text discussion: the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.721596
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZCorporation_NonCompliantState_StandardsViolation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: The corporation's non-compliant state is the underlying condition that creates all ethical obligations for Doe
source text: [discussion] it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
source text discussion: it is presumed that a failure to meet the minimum standards established by law is detrimental to the public health and safety.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.994089
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_Compliance_Data_Discharge
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.978585
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_Compliance_Data_Submission
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.943229
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_Corporation_Documentation_Suppression
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Central to the ethical dilemma - XYZ's suppression attempt triggers Doe's reporting obligations under Section 2(c)
source text: [discussion] Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
source text discussion: Doe, however, has reason to question why the corporation specifically stipulates that he not render a written report.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.955978
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_ETHICAL_CONDUCT_OBLIGATION
type: Obligation
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.733738
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_EnvironmentalHarmRisk_WaterDischarge
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: The underlying environmental risk that creates the public welfare dimension of the ethical case
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.765396
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_EnvironmentalViolationRisk_WaterDischarge
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Underlying environmental risk that XYZ is attempting to conceal from regulatory authority
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.956439
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_EnvironmentalViolation_WaterDischarge
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: The underlying condition that XYZ sought to conceal and that creates public welfare concerns
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.994651
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_MisleadingSubmission_PublicHearing
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Escalates the ethical dilemma - Doe now knows XYZ is presenting contradictory data to regulators at a public forum
source text: [facts] Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
source text facts: Doe learns that the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.995172
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_NonCompliance_StandardsViolation
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: XYZ's non-compliance with established standards is the underlying public safety concern
source text: [discussion] the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
source text discussion: the results of his studies indicate that the established standards will in his opinion be violated
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.765830
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_NonCompliantState_DischargeStandards
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Underlying non-compliance state that XYZ is attempting to conceal from regulatory authority
case involvement: XYZ's actual non-compliant status that contradicts their public hearing presentation
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.995699
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_NonCompliant_DischargeStandards
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: The non-compliant state that XYZ is attempting to conceal from the regulatory authority
source text: [facts] Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly.
source text facts: Doe concludes that the discharge from the plant will lower the quality of the receiving body of water below established standards. He further concludes that corrective action will be very costly.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.766261
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_Public_Hearing_Data_Submission
type: Resource
type: NamedIndividual
source text: [facts] the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
source text facts: the authority has called a public hearing and that the XYZ Corporation has presented data to support its view that the present discharge meets minimum standards
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.750065
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_RegulatoryComplianceDeadline_DischargePermit
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Created the context for hiring Engineer Doe and the subsequent ethical conflict
source text: [facts] The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water.
source text facts: The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.766688
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_RegulatoryDeadline_60Days
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Created the context for hiring Engineer Doe and subsequent ethical dilemma
case involvement: Created the context requiring XYZ to hire Doe and subsequently led to the ethical dilemma when findings were unfavorable
source text: [facts] The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water.
source text facts: The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit to discharge manufacturing wastes into a receiving body of water.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.996273
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ_Request_Unprofessional_Conduct
type: State
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: The Board interprets XYZ's combined actions as constituting a request for unprofessional conduct, making it unprofessional for Doe to NOT take further action
source text: [discussion] The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c). We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
source text discussion: The client's action instructing Doe to not render a written report when coupled with XYZ's testimony at the hearing raises the question of Doe's obligation under §2(c). We interpret the language in the context of the facts to mean that it would now be 'unprofessional conduct' for Doe to not take further action to protect the public interest.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.958721
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ data presentation during public hearing
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.005884
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

contract termination before public hearing announcement
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.006277
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

contract termination before verbal advice to corporation
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.772007
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

proper authorities
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.947715
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

study completion before written report completion
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.006810
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

the board
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Conducting hearing, interpreting Section 2(c) of the code for the first time, determining Engineer Doe's obligations under the code
has active obligation: Adjudicate professional conduct matters
has active obligation: Interpret code of ethics provisions
has active obligation: Protect public safety, health, and welfare
has jurisdiction over: Engineer Doe
receives testimony from: XYZ Corporation
source text: [discussion] We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code.
source text discussion: We note that we have not heretofore during the entire existence of the board had occasion to interpret §2(c) of the code.
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:57:44.948196
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

verbal advice to XYZ before contract termination
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:20.007276
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

verbal findings report before XYZ presenting contradictory data
type: NamedIndividual
generated at time: 2026-01-17T09:25:39.772690
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

State Pollution Control Authority
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Advised XYZ Corporation of permit requirement and 60-day deadline; established minimum standards; called public hearing on the matter
case involvement: Advised XYZ Corporation of permit requirement and minimum standards, called public hearing on the matter
case involvement: Advised XYZ Corporation of permit requirement and minimum standards; called public hearing where XYZ presented data
conducts hearing regarding: XYZ Corporation
has active obligation: Conduct public hearings
has active obligation: Enforce compliance
has active obligation: Enforce environmental standards
has active obligation: Establish environmental standards
has active obligation: Protect water quality
has active obligation: Review permit applications
regulates: XYZ Corporation
source text: [facts] The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
source text facts: The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.981553
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

Engineer Doe
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Retained to study discharge impacts, concluded discharge would lower water quality below standards, verbally advised corporation, contract terminated before written report, learned corporation presented contradictory data at public hearing
case involvement: Retained to study whether manufacturing waste discharge would meet environmental standards; concluded discharge would lower water quality below standards and corrective action would be costly; verbally advised corporation; contract terminated with instruction not to submit written report
case involvement: Retained to study whether manufacturing waste discharge would meet environmental standards; concluded discharge would lower water quality below standards; verbally advised corporation; contract terminated before written report; learned corporation presented contrary data at public hearing
contract terminated by: XYZ Corporation
employed by: XYZ Corporation
has active obligation: Assess whether discharge meets environmental standards
has active obligation: Perform consulting engineering services
has active obligation: Provide honest technical assessment
has active obligation: Submit detailed report on discharge impacts
has ethical tension: Client subsequently presented contradictory data to public authority
has ethical tension: Client terminated contract after unfavorable findings
has ethical tension: Client terminated contract after unfavorable verbal findings
has ethical tension: Conflict between client confidentiality and public welfare
has ethical tension: Conflict between client instructions and public welfare/truthfulness obligations
has ethical tension: Instructed not to render written report
has ethical tension: Instructed not to render written report despite completing studies
has ethical tension: Knowledge that corporation presented data at public hearing contradicting his findings
has ethical tension: Knowledge that corporation presented data contradicting his findings at public hearing
has specialization: consulting engineering services
has title: Engineer
source text: [facts] the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
source text facts: the corporation employs Engineer Doe to perform consulting engineering services and submit a detailed report
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.979617
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit

XYZ Corporation
type: Role
type: NamedIndividual
case involvement: Advised by authority to apply for discharge permit; employed Engineer Doe for assessment; terminated contract after unfavorable verbal findings; presented contradictory data at public hearing
case involvement: Required to apply for discharge permit, hired Engineer Doe for assessment, terminated contract after unfavorable verbal findings, presented contradictory data at public hearing
case involvement: Required to apply for discharge permit; retained Engineer Doe for environmental study; terminated contract after unfavorable verbal findings; instructed Doe not to submit written report; presented data at public hearing claiming discharge meets standards
employed: Engineer Doe
employs: Engineer Doe
has active obligation: Apply for discharge permit within 60 days
has active obligation: Apply for permit to discharge manufacturing wastes within 60 days
has active obligation: Meet minimum discharge standards
has active obligation: Meet minimum environmental standards
has active obligation: Present accurate data to regulatory authority
has active obligation: Provide accurate data to regulatory authority
has ethical tension: Instructed engineer not to submit written report
has ethical tension: Presented data at public hearing supporting view that discharge meets standards despite engineer's contrary findings
has ethical tension: Presented data supporting compliance despite engineer's contrary conclusions
has ethical tension: Presented data to authority supporting view that discharge meets standards despite engineer's contrary conclusions
has ethical tension: Suppressed engineer's report
has ethical tension: Terminated engineer after receiving unfavorable findings
has ethical tension: Terminated engineer contract after receiving unfavorable findings
regulated by: State Pollution Control Authority
source text: [facts] The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
source text facts: The XYZ Corporation has been advised by a State Pollution Control Authority that it has 60 days to apply for a permit
terminated contract with: Engineer Doe
generated at time: 2026-01-17T08:39:19.982098
was generated by: ProEthica Case 72 Auto-Commit