Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation State
Class
e3a84101
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState
Definition
State in which a licensed engineer on a shared project has an objective basis to conclude that another engineer retained for a specific task lacks the education, training, or experience to perform that task competently, creating a sequential obligation: first to confront the other engineer directly, then to recommend withdrawal, and if refused, to escalate to the client and relevant authorities — and if concerns remain unaddressed, to withdraw from the project.
Properties
Subclass of
Definition
State in which a licensed engineer on a shared project has an objective basis to conclude that another engineer retained for a specific task lacks the education, training, or experience to perform that task competently, creating a sequential obligation: first to confront the other engineer directly, then to recommend withdrawal, and if refused, to escalate to the client and relevant authorities — and if concerns remain unaddressed, to withdraw from the project.
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A had an ethical responsibility to question Engineer B's competency and report his concerns to the contractor
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_intermediate_extended: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate-extended> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerCompetenceChallengeReportingObligationState> a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Peer Competence Challenge Reporting Obligation State" ;
rdfs:comment "State in which a licensed engineer on a shared project has an objective basis to conclude that another engineer retained for a specific task lacks the education, training, or experience to perform that task competently, creating a sequential obligation: first to confront the other engineer directly, then to recommend withdrawal, and if refused, to escalate to the client and relevant authorities — and if concerns remain unaddressed, to withdraw from the project." ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#State> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Class
Content Hash
e3a841018a61f200...Last Updated
2026-03-12 16:49
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
74
Discovered In Pass
1
Discovered In Section
discussion
First Discovered At
2026-02-26T23:19:30.208023+00:00
First Discovered In Case
74
Generated
2026-02-26T23:19:30.208023+00:00
Was Attributed To
Case 74 Extraction