Evaluator Feedback Informational Advantage in Active Procurement State
Class
6b900955
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EvaluatorFeedbackInformationalAdvantageinActiveProcurementState
Definition
State in which a competing firm in an active qualification-based selection process has received specific, individualized feedback from the evaluating authority identifying weaknesses in its submission — feedback not available to other competing firms — creating an asymmetric informational condition that the firm may use to improve its competitive position, raising ethical questions about whether acting on such feedback constitutes an unfair advantage even when the authority permits responsive modification with equal access offered to all.
Properties
Subclass of
Definition
State in which a competing firm in an active qualification-based selection process has received specific, individualized feedback from the evaluating authority identifying weaknesses in its submission — feedback not available to other competing firms — creating an asymmetric informational condition that the firm may use to improve its competitive position, raising ethical questions about whether acting on such feedback constitutes an unfair advantage even when the authority permits responsive modification with equal access offered to all.
Source Evidence
Source Text
the screening committee of the authority felt that its joint venture proposal did not indicate sufficient experience in certain technical aspects
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_intermediate_extended: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate-extended> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EvaluatorFeedbackInformationalAdvantageinActiveProcurementState> a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Evaluator Feedback Informational Advantage in Active Procurement State" ;
rdfs:comment "State in which a competing firm in an active qualification-based selection process has received specific, individualized feedback from the evaluating authority identifying weaknesses in its submission — feedback not available to other competing firms — creating an asymmetric informational condition that the firm may use to improve its competitive position, raising ethical questions about whether acting on such feedback constitutes an unfair advantage even when the authority permits responsive modification with equal access offered to all." ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#State> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Class
Content Hash
6b900955cd154548...Last Updated
2026-03-12 16:49
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
162
Discovered In Pass
1
Discovered In Section
facts
First Discovered At
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
First Discovered In Case
162
Generated
2026-03-02T02:37:04.438800+00:00
Was Attributed To
Case 162 Extraction