Disputed Design Safety Adequacy Between Originating and Executing Engineer State
Class
acf4e738
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#DisputedDesignSafetyAdequacyBetweenOriginatingandExecutingEngineerState
Definition
State in which the engineers responsible for executing or manufacturing a design have identified technical deficiencies and safety risks in plans prepared by another engineering firm, but the originating firm has reviewed the concern and formally asserted that the design is adequate and safe, creating an unresolved technical disagreement between two engineering parties with divergent assessments of the same design.
Properties
Subclass of
Definition
State in which the engineers responsible for executing or manufacturing a design have identified technical deficiencies and safety risks in plans prepared by another engineering firm, but the originating firm has reviewed the concern and formally asserted that the design is adequate and safe, creating an unresolved technical disagreement between two engineering parties with divergent assessments of the same design.
Source Evidence
Source Text
engineers of Company B in reviewing the plans and specifications came to the conclusion that they included certain miscalculations and technical deficiencies
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_intermediate_extended: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate-extended> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#DisputedDesignSafetyAdequacyBetweenOriginatingandExecutingEngineerState> a owl:Class ;
rdfs:label "Disputed Design Safety Adequacy Between Originating and Executing Engineer State" ;
rdfs:comment "State in which the engineers responsible for executing or manufacturing a design have identified technical deficiencies and safety risks in plans prepared by another engineering firm, but the originating firm has reviewed the concern and formally asserted that the design is adequate and safe, creating an unresolved technical disagreement between two engineering parties with divergent assessments of the same design." ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#State> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Class
Content Hash
acf4e738595c2f83...Last Updated
2026-03-12 16:49
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
160
Discovered In Pass
1
Discovered In Section
facts
First Discovered At
2026-03-02T14:25:03.045895+00:00
First Discovered In Case
160
Generated
2026-03-02T14:25:03.045895+00:00
Was Attributed To
Case 160 Extraction