Fairness in Professional Competition Invoked for All 14 Pre-Submittal Firms
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/99#Fairness_in_Professional_Competition_Invoked_for_All_14_Pre-Submittal_Firms
Properties
Instance of
FairnessinProfessionalCompetition
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#FairnessinProfessionalCompetition
Applied to
All 14 pre-submittal meeting participants
Firm B Late Submittal QBS Competitor
Balancing with
Client Loyalty
Concrete expression
All 14 firms that participated in the mandatory pre-submittal meeting received identical notice of the submittal deadline and location requirements; fairness to those firms — particularly any that may have submitted timely and to the correct location — requires that Engineer A enforce the published requirements uniformly and not accept Firm B's late, misdirected submittal
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Interpretation
Accepting Firm B's late submittal would disadvantage all other firms that complied with the published requirements, creating an unfair competitive advantage for Firm B and undermining the integrity of the QBS process
Invoked by
Engineer A QBS Review Team Point of Contact
Tension resolution
Fairness to all competing firms requires uniform enforcement of published requirements; the competitive fairness obligation overrides any sympathy for Firm B's misdirection circumstances
Source Evidence
Source text
The city conducted a mandatory pre-submittal meeting and received initial interest from 14 different firms.
Text references
City X published the date, time, and location of the submittal for the Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) indicating all submittals must be received by the city in the city clerk's office no later than 10:00 am on January 30.
The city conducted a mandatory pre-submittal meeting and received initial interest from 14 different firms.
The date, time, and location were also listed in the city's RFQ webpage and appeared on the hard copy agenda that was distributed at the pre-submittal meeting.
TTL
@prefix case99: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/99#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case99:Fairness_in_Professional_Competition_Invoked_for_All_14_Pre-Submittal_Firms a proeth:FairnessinProfessionalCompetition,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Fairness in Professional Competition Invoked for All 14 Pre-Submittal Firms" ;
proeth:appliedto "All 14 pre-submittal meeting participants",
"Firm B Late Submittal QBS Competitor" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Loyalty" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "All 14 firms that participated in the mandatory pre-submittal meeting received identical notice of the submittal deadline and location requirements; fairness to those firms — particularly any that may have submitted timely and to the correct location — requires that Engineer A enforce the published requirements uniformly and not accept Firm B's late, misdirected submittal" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "99" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T22:56:57.985736+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "99" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T22:56:57.985736+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "Accepting Firm B's late submittal would disadvantage all other firms that complied with the published requirements, creating an unfair competitive advantage for Firm B and undermining the integrity of the QBS process" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A QBS Review Team Point of Contact" ;
proeth:principleclass "Fairness in Professional Competition" ;
proeth:sourcetext "The city conducted a mandatory pre-submittal meeting and received initial interest from 14 different firms." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Fairness to all competing firms requires uniform enforcement of published requirements; the competitive fairness obligation overrides any sympathy for Firm B's misdirection circumstances" ;
proeth:textreferences "City X published the date, time, and location of the submittal for the Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) indicating all submittals must be received by the city in the city clerk's office no later than 10:00 am on January 30.",
"The city conducted a mandatory pre-submittal meeting and received initial interest from 14 different firms.",
"The date, time, and location were also listed in the city's RFQ webpage and appeared on the hard copy agenda that was distributed at the pre-submittal meeting." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 99 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T23:08:45.585640"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 99 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
99
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T22:56:57.985736+00:00
First case
99
Generated
2026-02-27T22:56:57.985736+00:00
Attributed to
Case 99 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T23:08:45.585640
Generated by
ProEthica Case 99 Extraction