Engineer A Prior Performance Non-Consideration Firm B Compliance Determination
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/99#Engineer_A_Prior_Performance_Non-Consideration_Firm_B_Compliance_Determination
Properties
Instance of
PriorPerformanceNon-ConsiderationinQBSComplianceDeterminationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PriorPerformanceNon-ConsiderationinQBSComplianceDeterminationObligation
Case context
Engineer A was aware of Firm B's prior good performance on several other engineering design projects for the city; the Board found this awareness could not ethically justify accepting Firm B's non-compliant submittal.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (QBS Review Team Point of Contact, City X)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to refrain from allowing Firm B's prior satisfactory performance on other city engineering contracts to influence the determination that Firm B's submittal was non-compliant with the published deadline and location requirements.
Temporal scope
At the time of making the compliance determination regarding Firm B's submittal
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
While Engineer A may have been mindful of the past performance of Firm B and may have viewed Firm B's failure to deliver the submittal to the correct city office by the required hour a harmless error
Text references
While Engineer A may have been mindful of the past performance of Firm B and may have viewed Firm B's failure to deliver the submittal to the correct city office by the required hour a harmless error
TTL
@prefix case99: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/99#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case99:Engineer_A_Prior_Performance_Non-Consideration_Firm_B_Compliance_Determination a proeth:PriorPerformanceNon-ConsiderationinQBSComplianceDeterminationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Prior Performance Non-Consideration Firm B Compliance Determination" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case99:Engineer_A_Procurement_Integrity_Public_Interest_QBS_Administration ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case99:Conflict_of_Interest_-_Engineer_A_QBS_Evaluator_with_Known_Firm,
case99:Engineer_A_Prior_Favorable_Relationship_with_Firm_B ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A was aware of Firm B's prior good performance on several other engineering design projects for the city; the Board found this awareness could not ethically justify accepting Firm B's non-compliant submittal." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case99:Prior_Performance_Non-Consideration_Invoked_in_Firm_B_Compliance_Determination,
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/99#Prior_Performance_Non-Consideration_—_Engineer_A_Awareness_of_Firm_B_History> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "99" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T23:02:03.113089+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "99" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T23:02:03.113089+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (QBS Review Team Point of Contact, City X)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Prior Performance Non-Consideration in QBS Compliance Determination Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to refrain from allowing Firm B's prior satisfactory performance on other city engineering contracts to influence the determination that Firm B's submittal was non-compliant with the published deadline and location requirements." ;
proeth:sourcetext "While Engineer A may have been mindful of the past performance of Firm B and may have viewed Firm B's failure to deliver the submittal to the correct city office by the required hour a harmless error" ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of making the compliance determination regarding Firm B's submittal" ;
proeth:textreferences "While Engineer A may have been mindful of the past performance of Firm B and may have viewed Firm B's failure to deliver the submittal to the correct city office by the required hour a harmless error" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 99 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T23:08:45.591232"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 99 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
99
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T23:02:03.113089+00:00
First case
99
Generated
2026-02-27T23:02:03.113089+00:00
Attributed to
Case 99 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T23:08:45.591232
Generated by
ProEthica Case 99 Extraction