Pre-Bid Constructability Consultation Conflict — Engineer A and Contractor B
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/98#Pre-Bid_Constructability_Consultation_Conflict_—_Engineer_A_and_Contractor_B
Properties
Instance of
Pre-BidConstructabilityConsultationConflictState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Pre-BidConstructabilityConsultationConflictState
Active period
During design phase prior to public bid opening
Affected parties
Client/Owner
Contractor B
Engineer A
Other potential bidders
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's consideration of consulting solely with Contractor B during design phase
Terminated by
Decision to hold publicly advertised constructability meeting or conclusion of design phase
Triggering event
Engineer A's recognition that contractor input would improve design and construction outcomes, combined with Contractor B's status as a potential bidder
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Rather than consulting solely with Contractor B, Engineer A could have conducted a publically advertised constructability meeting
Text references
Rather than consulting solely with Contractor B, Engineer A could have conducted a publically advertised constructability meeting
Such a process would avoid any appearance of favoritism toward one particular contractor
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/98#Pre-Bid_Constructability_Consultation_Conflict_—_Engineer_A_and_Contractor_B> a proeth:Pre-BidConstructabilityConsultationConflictState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Pre-Bid Constructability Consultation Conflict — Engineer A and Contractor B" ;
proeth:activeperiod "During design phase prior to public bid opening" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client/Owner",
"Contractor B",
"Engineer A",
"Other potential bidders" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "98" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T00:31:33.437827+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "98" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T00:31:33.437827+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Rather than consulting solely with Contractor B, Engineer A could have conducted a publically advertised constructability meeting" ;
proeth:stateclass "Pre-Bid Constructability Consultation Conflict State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's consideration of consulting solely with Contractor B during design phase" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Decision to hold publicly advertised constructability meeting or conclusion of design phase" ;
proeth:textreferences "Rather than consulting solely with Contractor B, Engineer A could have conducted a publically advertised constructability meeting",
"Such a process would avoid any appearance of favoritism toward one particular contractor" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's recognition that contractor input would improve design and construction outcomes, combined with Contractor B's status as a potential bidder" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 98 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T00:43:22.143997"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 98 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
98
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T00:31:33.437827+00:00
First case
98
Generated
2026-02-28T00:31:33.437827+00:00
Attributed to
Case 98 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T00:43:22.143997
Generated by
ProEthica Case 98 Extraction