Engineer A - Client Relationship with Prospective Purchasers

Individual f11ab8db
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/97#Engineer_A_-_Client_Relationship_with_Prospective_Purchasers
Properties
Parent
ClientRelationshipEstablished
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientRelationshipEstablished
Activeperiod
From engagement for inspection service through delivery of written report and subsequent dispute
Affectedparties
Client (husband and wife)
Engineer A
Concept Category
State
Confidence
0.97
Importance
high
Stateclass
Client Relationship Established
Subject
Engineer A's paid inspection service agreement with husband and wife prospective purchasers
Terminatedby
Not terminated within the case facts; dispute arises within the active relationship
Triggeringevent
Husband and wife retained Engineer A for a fee to perform a residential inspection
Urgencylevel
medium
Source Evidence
Source Text
Engineer A performed this service for a client (husband and wife) for a fee and prepared a one-page written report

Text References
Engineer A performed this service for a client (husband and wife) for a fee and prepared a one-page written report
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_97: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/97> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/97#Engineer_A_-_Client_Relationship_with_Prospective_Purchasers> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A - Client Relationship with Prospective Purchasers" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientRelationshipEstablished> .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Content Hash
f11ab8dbdb37049e...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
97
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-01T19:18:00.941480+00:00
First Case
97
Generated
2026-03-01T19:18:00.941480+00:00
Attributed To
Case 97 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T19:35:14.536546
Generated By
ProEthica Case 97 Extraction