Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard - Design-Build Joint Venture
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Post-Peer-Review_Procurement_Conflict_Standard_-_Design-Build_Joint_Venture
Properties
Instance of
Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard
Confidence
0.91
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review / professional engineering ethics community
Document title
Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard
Importance
high
Used by
BER in evaluating the conflict of interest question regarding the design-build joint venture
Used in context
Applied to evaluate whether Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in a design-build joint venture following the peer review of XYZ's design raises an impermissible conflict of interest due to access to confidential, nonpublic information gained during the peer review
Source Evidence
Source text
the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages. However, the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest.
Text references
The Board notes that state laws may vary regarding whether this situation constitutes a conflict of interest.
the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages. However, the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest.
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:Post-Peer-Review_Procurement_Conflict_Standard_-_Design-Build_Joint_Venture a proeth:Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard - Design-Build Joint Venture" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review / professional engineering ethics community" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:44:14.315827+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:44:14.315827+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages. However, the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest." ;
proeth:textreferences "The Board notes that state laws may vary regarding whether this situation constitutes a conflict of interest.",
"the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages. However, the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest." ;
proeth:usedby "BER in evaluating the conflict of interest question regarding the design-build joint venture" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Applied to evaluate whether Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in a design-build joint venture following the peer review of XYZ's design raises an impermissible conflict of interest due to access to confidential, nonpublic information gained during the peer review" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.112093"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:44:14.315827+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:44:14.315827+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.112093
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction