Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard - ABC Engineering Case
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Post-Peer-Review_Procurement_Conflict_Standard_-_ABC_Engineering_Case
Properties
Instance of
Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard
Confidence
0.95
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review and professional engineering societies
Document title
Professional norms governing post-peer-review procurement participation
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A in evaluating the ethical permissibility of the design-build joint venture invitation
Used in context
Governs whether ABC Engineering may ethically participate in the design-build RFP after having served as independent peer reviewer on the same project
Version
Current professional consensus
Source Evidence
Source text
ABC Engineering is retained by a state agency to participate in an independent external peer review
Text references
ABC Engineering is retained by a state agency to participate in an independent external peer review
XYZ Construction invites ABC Engineering to participate in a design-build joint venture and submit a proposal for the major road transportation project
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:Post-Peer-Review_Procurement_Conflict_Standard_-_ABC_Engineering_Case a proeth:Post-Peer-ReviewProcurementConflictStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard - ABC Engineering Case" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review and professional engineering societies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional norms governing post-peer-review procurement participation" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:43:57.272050+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:43:57.272050+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Post-Peer-Review Procurement Conflict Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "ABC Engineering is retained by a state agency to participate in an independent external peer review" ;
proeth:textreferences "ABC Engineering is retained by a state agency to participate in an independent external peer review",
"XYZ Construction invites ABC Engineering to participate in a design-build joint venture and submit a proposal for the major road transportation project" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A in evaluating the ethical permissibility of the design-build joint venture invitation" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs whether ABC Engineering may ethically participate in the design-build RFP after having served as independent peer reviewer on the same project" ;
proeth:version "Current professional consensus" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.110583"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:43:57.272050+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:43:57.272050+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.110583
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction