Peer Review Confidentiality Foundation - Program Level
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Foundation_-_Program_Level
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewProgramConfidentialityFoundationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewProgramConfidentialityFoundationState
Active period
From program inception through all peer review engagements conducted under it
Affected parties
Peer reviewers
Program administrators
Public
Reviewed firms
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Organized peer-review program's foundational confidentiality structure
Terminated by
Program dissolution or policy change removing confidentiality requirement
Triggering event
Establishment of peer-review program requiring confidentiality agreements as a condition of reviewer participation
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'
Text references
Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'
confidentiality helps build trust between the parties in the peer-review process and promotes an atmosphere that will improve the likelihood that the process will be mutually productive
confidentiality helps to assure that the maximum amount of disclosure will occur
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Foundation_-_Program_Level a proeth:PeerReviewProgramConfidentialityFoundationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Peer Review Confidentiality Foundation - Program Level" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From program inception through all peer review engagements conducted under it" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Peer reviewers",
"Program administrators",
"Public",
"Reviewed firms" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'" ;
proeth:stateclass "Peer Review Program Confidentiality Foundation State" ;
proeth:subject "Organized peer-review program's foundational confidentiality structure" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Program dissolution or policy change removing confidentiality requirement" ;
proeth:textreferences "Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'",
"confidentiality helps build trust between the parties in the peer-review process and promotes an atmosphere that will improve the likelihood that the process will be mutually productive",
"confidentiality helps to assure that the maximum amount of disclosure will occur" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Establishment of peer-review program requiring confidentiality agreements as a condition of reviewer participation" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.112287"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.112287
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction