Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Absent - BER Case Context
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_Absent_-_BER_Case_Context
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementAbsentState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementAbsentState
Active period
When peer review proceeds without a confidentiality agreement in place
Affected parties
Peer reviewer
Program administrators
Reviewed firm
Confidence
0.88
Importance
medium
Subject
Absence of confidentiality agreement in peer review contexts where one is not required or not executed, contrasted with the standard program requirement
Terminated by
Execution of confidentiality agreement or completion of review
Triggering event
Peer review engagement initiated without execution of confidentiality agreement
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'
Text references
Firms being peer reviewed should be encouraged to provide as much pertinent, detailed information to the peer reviewer
Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_Absent_-_BER_Case_Context a proeth:PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementAbsentState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Absent - BER Case Context" ;
proeth:activeperiod "When peer review proceeds without a confidentiality agreement in place" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Peer reviewer",
"Program administrators",
"Reviewed firm" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'" ;
proeth:stateclass "Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Absent State" ;
proeth:subject "Absence of confidentiality agreement in peer review contexts where one is not required or not executed, contrasted with the standard program requirement" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Execution of confidentiality agreement or completion of review" ;
proeth:textreferences "Firms being peer reviewed should be encouraged to provide as much pertinent, detailed information to the peer reviewer",
"Such programs are generally built on a foundation of confidentiality, whereby an individual agreeing to serve as a peer reviewer must sign a 'confidentiality agreement'" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Peer review engagement initiated without execution of confidentiality agreement" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.113119"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.113119
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction