Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement - Absence on Transportation Project
Individual
7022b1bb
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_-_Absence_on_Transportation_Project
Properties
Parent
PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreement
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreement
Concept Category
Resource
Confidence
0.93
Createdby
State agency (by omission)
Documenttitle
Absence of confidentiality agreement on the major state-funded transportation project peer review
Importance
high
Resourceclass
Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement
Usedby
Engineer A in assessing constraints on use of peer review knowledge in design-build proposal
Usedincontext
The absence of a confidentiality agreement is explicitly noted as a material fact shaping the ethical analysis of whether ABC Engineering may use knowledge gained during peer review in a subsequent competitive proposal
Version
N/A - absence noted
Source Evidence
Source Text
No confidentiality agreement exists on the project
Text References
No confidentiality agreement exists on the project
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Peer_Review_Confidentiality_Agreement_-_Absence_on_Transportation_Project> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement - Absence on Transportation Project" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreement> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
7022b1bb1df9ebbb...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
96
Discovered in Pass
1
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-02-27T21:43:57.272050+00:00
First Case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:43:57.272050+00:00
Attributed To
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.110727
Generated By
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction