Firm A Public Agency Role Marketing Exploitation BER 94-5

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Firm_A_Public_Agency_Role_Marketing_Exploitation_BER_94-5
Properties
Instance of
PublicAgencyRoleMarketingExploitationProhibitionObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PublicAgencyRoleMarketingExploitationProhibitionObligation
Case context
Firm A openly used its city engineer role to market private services to developers subject to its public review authority, telling prospective clients they could save 50% on inspection costs by using Firm A.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Firm A (private consulting engineering firm)
Obligation statement
Firm A was obligated to refrain from using its position as the city's engineer as a marketing tool to attract private developer clients, including refraining from advertising that private developers could save 50% on inspection costs by also retaining Firm A for private services.
Temporal scope
Throughout the period of dual engagement
Source Evidence
Source text
Firm A used its position as the city's engineer as a marketing tool, openly telling prospective clients that they can save 50% on inspection costs by using Firm A.

Text references
Firm A used its position as the city's engineer as a marketing tool, openly telling prospective clients that they can save 50% on inspection costs by using Firm A.
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case96:Firm_A_Public_Agency_Role_Marketing_Exploitation_BER_94-5 a proeth:PublicAgencyRoleMarketingExploitationProhibitionObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Firm A Public Agency Role Marketing Exploitation BER 94-5" ; proeth-core:competesWith case96:Firm_A_Dual-Role_City_Engineer_Private_Developer_Service_Conflict_BER_94-5 ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case96:Dual_Role_City_Engineer_and_Private_Developer_Consultant_-_Firm_A ; proeth:casecontext "Firm A openly used its city engineer role to market private services to developers subject to its public review authority, telling prospective clients they could save 50% on inspection costs by using Firm A." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.88" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case96:Dual-Role_Conflict_of_Interest_Invoked_in_BER_Case_94-5 ; proeth:discoveredincase "96" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Firm A (private consulting engineering firm)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Public Agency Role Marketing Exploitation Prohibition Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Firm A was obligated to refrain from using its position as the city's engineer as a marketing tool to attract private developer clients, including refraining from advertising that private developers could save 50% on inspection costs by also retaining Firm A for private services." ; proeth:sourcetext "Firm A used its position as the city's engineer as a marketing tool, openly telling prospective clients that they can save 50% on inspection costs by using Firm A." ; proeth:temporalscope "Throughout the period of dual engagement" ; proeth:textreferences "Firm A used its position as the city's engineer as a marketing tool, openly telling prospective clients that they can save 50% on inspection costs by using Firm A." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.319187"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.319187
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction