Engineer A ABC Engineering Insider Knowledge from Peer Review
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#Engineer_A_ABC_Engineering_Insider_Knowledge_from_Peer_Review
Properties
Instance of
Post-Peer-ReviewDesign-BuildProcurementParticipationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-Peer-ReviewDesign-BuildProcurementParticipationState
Active period
From completion of peer review through participation in design-build joint venture procurement
Affected parties
ABC Engineering
Client
Competing design-build proposers
Engineer A
XYZ Construction
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A and ABC Engineering's access to confidential nonpublic information from peer review and subsequent participation with XYZ Construction in design-build joint venture
Terminated by
BER determination that participation does not raise a conflict of interest under the specific facts presented
Triggering event
Engineer A's peer review of project generating insider knowledge, followed by invitation to participate in design-build joint venture with XYZ Construction
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages
Text references
The Board notes that state laws may vary regarding whether this situation constitutes a conflict of interest
the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest
the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:Engineer_A_ABC_Engineering_Insider_Knowledge_from_Peer_Review a proeth:Post-Peer-ReviewDesign-BuildProcurementParticipationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A ABC Engineering Insider Knowledge from Peer Review" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From completion of peer review through participation in design-build joint venture procurement" ;
proeth:affectedparties "ABC Engineering",
"Client",
"Competing design-build proposers",
"Engineer A",
"XYZ Construction" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages" ;
proeth:stateclass "Post-Peer-Review Design-Build Procurement Participation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A and ABC Engineering's access to confidential nonpublic information from peer review and subsequent participation with XYZ Construction in design-build joint venture" ;
proeth:terminatedby "BER determination that participation does not raise a conflict of interest under the specific facts presented" ;
proeth:textreferences "The Board notes that state laws may vary regarding whether this situation constitutes a conflict of interest",
"the BER does not believe Engineer A and ABC Engineering's participation with XYZ Construction in the design-build joint venture raises a conflict of interest",
"the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's peer review of project generating insider knowledge, followed by invitation to participate in design-build joint venture with XYZ Construction" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.112964"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:44:22.519953+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.112964
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction