DP7

Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#DP7
Properties
Instance of
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP7
Decision question
Should Engineer A proactively disclose to the state agency, at the time of accepting the peer review engagement and again upon receiving the design-build invitation from XYZ Construction, any foreseeable or actual interest in future procurement opportunities related to the same project — rather than relying on the agency to independently identify and evaluate the conflict?
Focus
Engineer A / ABC Engineering: Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Timing Obligation Upon Accepting Peer Review and Upon Receiving Design-Build Invitation
Option1
Disclose to the state agency at the time of accepting the peer review engagement any foreseeable interest in future design-build procurement on the same project, and again immediately upon receiving the design-build invitation from XYZ Construction, seeking explicit informed agency approval before proceeding
Option2
Disclose the conflict to the state agency upon receiving the design-build invitation — treating that moment as the point at which the conflict becomes concrete and actionable — and seek agency approval before submitting any proposal
Option3
Decline the design-build joint venture invitation entirely, treating the peer review role as categorically precluding subsequent competitive participation on the same project regardless of agency approval or elapsed time
Role
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case96:DP7 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP7" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP7" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer A proactively disclose to the state agency, at the time of accepting the peer review engagement and again upon receiving the design-build invitation from XYZ Construction, any foreseeable or actual interest in future procurement opportunities related to the same project — rather than relying on the agency to independently identify and evaluate the conflict?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer A / ABC Engineering: Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Timing Obligation Upon Accepting Peer Review and Upon Receiving Design-Build Invitation" ; proeth:option1 "Disclose to the state agency at the time of accepting the peer review engagement any foreseeable interest in future design-build procurement on the same project, and again immediately upon receiving the design-build invitation from XYZ Construction, seeking explicit informed agency approval before proceeding" ; proeth:option2 "Disclose the conflict to the state agency upon receiving the design-build invitation — treating that moment as the point at which the conflict becomes concrete and actionable — and seek agency approval before submitting any proposal" ; proeth:option3 "Decline the design-build joint venture invitation entirely, treating the peer review role as categorically precluding subsequent competitive participation on the same project regardless of agency approval or elapsed time" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer A" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:21:46.934622"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Generated
2026-02-27T22:21:46.934622
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction