DP5
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#DP5
Properties
Instance of
Decision Point Id
DP5
Decision question
At what point was Engineer A obligated to disclose a foreseeable interest in future procurement opportunities related to the same project — at the moment of accepting the peer review engagement, or only upon receipt of the design-build invitation after the RFP was issued?
Focus
Engineer A Proactive Conflict of Interest Disclosure Timing: At Peer Review Acceptance vs. Upon RFP Issuance
Option1
Disclose to the state agency any foreseeable interest in future design-build procurement opportunities on the same project at the moment of accepting the peer review engagement, before any privileged design information is accessed
Option2
Disclose the conflict of interest to the state agency immediately upon receiving the design-build joint venture invitation from XYZ Construction, before taking any further steps toward proposal development, and seek explicit agency approval as a condition of participation
Option3
Treat the disclosure obligation as triggered only upon formal submission of a design-build proposal, relying on the one-year elapsed period and the public nature of the RFP as sufficient to neutralize any prior informational advantage, and disclose the peer review history in the proposal documents themselves
Role
Engineer
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:DP5 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP5" ;
proeth:decisionPointId "DP5" ;
proeth:decisionQuestion "At what point was Engineer A obligated to disclose a foreseeable interest in future procurement opportunities related to the same project — at the moment of accepting the peer review engagement, or only upon receipt of the design-build invitation after the RFP was issued?" ;
proeth:focus "Engineer A Proactive Conflict of Interest Disclosure Timing: At Peer Review Acceptance vs. Upon RFP Issuance" ;
proeth:option1 "Disclose to the state agency any foreseeable interest in future design-build procurement opportunities on the same project at the moment of accepting the peer review engagement, before any privileged design information is accessed" ;
proeth:option2 "Disclose the conflict of interest to the state agency immediately upon receiving the design-build joint venture invitation from XYZ Construction, before taking any further steps toward proposal development, and seek explicit agency approval as a condition of participation" ;
proeth:option3 "Treat the disclosure obligation as triggered only upon formal submission of a design-build proposal, relying on the one-year elapsed period and the public nature of the RFP as sufficient to neutralize any prior informational advantage, and disclose the peer review history in the proposal documents themselves" ;
proeth:roleLabel "Engineer" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:21:46.934439"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Generated
2026-02-27T22:21:46.934439
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction