DP4

Individual 8364c49f
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#DP4
Properties
Parent
DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint
Decision Point Id
DP4
Decision Question
Should Engineer A and ABC Engineering accept the design-build joint venture invitation and submit a proposal for the same project they peer-reviewed, given the informational asymmetry created by their privileged advisory access?
Focus
ABC Engineering Post-Peer-Review Design-Build Participation: Privileged Access Non-Exploitation and Conflict of Interest Assessment
Option1
Disclose the peer review conflict to the state agency immediately upon receiving the design-build invitation, seek explicit agency approval, and implement internal information firewalls separating the peer review team from the proposal development team before submitting a design-build proposal
Option2
Decline the design-build joint venture invitation entirely on the grounds that the peer review's direct contributions to the RFP create an informational asymmetry that no cooling-off period or agency approval can adequately remediate, thereby preserving the integrity of the advisory relationship and the peer review program
Option3
Accept the design-build invitation and proceed with proposal development in reliance on the one-year elapsed period and the absence of a formal confidentiality agreement, treating the peer review engagement as concluded and the information gained as no longer conferring a material competitive advantage
Role Label
Engineer
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proethica_case_96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#DP4> a owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP4" ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Content Hash
8364c49f6be90654...
Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T22:21:46.934371
Generated By
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction