DP11
Individual
29ecc538
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#DP11
Properties
Parent
Decision Point Id
DP11
Decision Question
At what point was Engineer A obligated to disclose any foreseeable interest in future procurement opportunities related to the same project — at the time of accepting the peer review engagement, or only upon receipt of the design-build RFP — and does the absence of a formal confidentiality agreement affect the scope or timing of that disclosure duty?
Focus
Engineer A's Proactive Conflict Disclosure Timing: At Peer Review Acceptance vs. Upon RFP Issuance
Option1
Disclose to the state agency, at the time of accepting the peer review engagement, any foreseeable firm interest in future design-build procurement opportunities on the same project, and request the agency's acknowledgment of that potential conflict as a condition of proceeding
Option2
Accept the peer review engagement without upfront disclosure of potential future procurement interest, on the grounds that no specific design-build opportunity exists at that time and that disclosure obligations under Code Section II.4.a are triggered only by known or concrete conflicts rather than speculative future interests
Option3
Accept the peer review engagement and disclose the potential conflict only upon receipt of the design-build invitation from XYZ Construction, treating that moment as the point at which the conflict becomes sufficiently concrete to trigger the Code Section II.4.a disclosure obligation
Role Label
Engineer A
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#DP11> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "DP11" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
29ecc538e0628416...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Generated
2026-02-27T22:21:46.935041
Generated By
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction