ABC Engineering Post-Review Design-Build Participation Conflict Disclosure to Agency
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#ABC_Engineering_Post-Review_Design-Build_Participation_Conflict_Disclosure_to_Agency
Properties
Instance of
Post-ReviewDesign-BuildParticipationConflictDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Post-ReviewDesign-BuildParticipationConflictDisclosureObligation
Case context
ABC Engineering completed an independent external peer review of the state transportation project and was subsequently invited to join a design-build joint venture for the same project, creating a sequential role transition requiring disclosure to the agency.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
ABC Engineering (Engineer A's firm)
Obligation statement
ABC Engineering was obligated to disclose to the state agency its prior peer review role, the privileged access to construction plans and specifications obtained during that review, and any potential conflict of interest arising from the sequential roles, before accepting XYZ Construction's invitation to participate in the design-build joint venture.
Temporal scope
Before accepting the design-build joint venture invitation and before submitting any proposal
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
Turning to the facts, the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages.
Text references
The Board notes that state laws may vary regarding whether this situation constitutes a conflict of interest.
Turning to the facts, the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages.
TTL
@prefix case96: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/96#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case96:ABC_Engineering_Post-Review_Design-Build_Participation_Conflict_Disclosure_to_Agency a proeth:Post-ReviewDesign-BuildParticipationConflictDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "ABC Engineering Post-Review Design-Build Participation Conflict Disclosure to Agency" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case96:ABC_Engineering_Post-Peer-Review_Design-Build_Procurement_Participation ;
proeth:casecontext "ABC Engineering completed an independent external peer review of the state transportation project and was subsequently invited to join a design-build joint venture for the same project, creating a sequential role transition requiring disclosure to the agency." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case96:Agency_Disclosure_and_Approval_Obligation_Invoked_by_ABC_Engineering_Pre-Participation_Decision,
case96:Peer_Review_Independence_and_Integrity_Invoked_by_ABC_Engineering_Post-Review_Commercial_Decision ;
proeth:discoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "96" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "ABC Engineering (Engineer A's firm)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Post-Review Design-Build Participation Conflict Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "ABC Engineering was obligated to disclose to the state agency its prior peer review role, the privileged access to construction plans and specifications obtained during that review, and any potential conflict of interest arising from the sequential roles, before accepting XYZ Construction's invitation to participate in the design-build joint venture." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Turning to the facts, the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Before accepting the design-build joint venture invitation and before submitting any proposal" ;
proeth:textreferences "The Board notes that state laws may vary regarding whether this situation constitutes a conflict of interest.",
"Turning to the facts, the access to confidential, nonpublic information could provide Engineer A with some advantages." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 96 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-27T22:02:18.319957"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 96 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
96
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00
First case
96
Generated
2026-02-27T21:53:35.223708+00:00
Attributed to
Case 96 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-27T22:02:18.319957
Generated by
ProEthica Case 96 Extraction