Engineer A Relevance Pertinence Judgment Traffic Noise Pollution City Planning Board
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Engineer_A_Relevance_Pertinence_Judgment_Traffic_Noise_Pollution_City_Planning_Board
Properties
Instance of
RelevanceandPertinenceJudgmentObligationatPublicHearings
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#RelevanceandPertinenceJudgmentObligationatPublicHearings
Case context
Engineer A, retained by Developer F, exercises judgment about what information to present at the City Planning Board hearing, choosing to highlight environmental benefits and not volunteering adverse traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts that were not directly questioned.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to exercise professional judgment about whether traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts were 'relevant and pertinent' to the City Planning Board hearing, and to volunteer only information that professional judgment identified as relevant and pertinent, without being required to volunteer all information possessed about the project.
Temporal scope
In preparing and delivering the public hearing presentation
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Engineer A Selective Testimony at Planning Board Hearing
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact.
Text references
Engineer A highlights the improved environmental effect of converting the waterfront from an industrial facility to a parkland.
Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact.
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:Engineer_A_Relevance_Pertinence_Judgment_Traffic_Noise_Pollution_City_Planning_Board a proeth:RelevanceandPertinenceJudgmentObligationatPublicHearings,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Relevance Pertinence Judgment Traffic Noise Pollution City Planning Board" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case94:Engineer_A_Selective_Testimony_at_Planning_Board_Hearing ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A, retained by Developer F, exercises judgment about what information to present at the City Planning Board hearing, choosing to highlight environmental benefits and not volunteering adverse traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts that were not directly questioned." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case94:Relevance_and_Pertinence_Standard_Invoked_by_Engineer_A_at_City_Planning_Board_Hearing ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Relevance and Pertinence Judgment Obligation at Public Hearings" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to exercise professional judgment about whether traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts were 'relevant and pertinent' to the City Planning Board hearing, and to volunteer only information that professional judgment identified as relevant and pertinent, without being required to volunteer all information possessed about the project." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact." ;
proeth:temporalscope "In preparing and delivering the public hearing presentation" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A highlights the improved environmental effect of converting the waterfront from an industrial facility to a parkland.",
"Engineer A is aware of these factors, but was not specifically questioned on these factors and does not volunteer this fact." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.366484"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T20:41:56.542419+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T20:55:42.366484
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction