Engineer A Present Case Relevance-Conditioned Traffic Noise Air Pollution Disclosure
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Engineer_A_Present_Case_Relevance-Conditioned_Traffic_Noise_Air_Pollution_Disclosure
Properties
Instance of
Client-RetainedPublicHearingEngineerAdverseImpactConditionalDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Client-RetainedPublicHearingEngineerAdverseImpactConditionalDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A, retained by Developer F, presented the waterfront development project to the City Planning Board, emphasizing environmental benefits (conversion of industrial waterfront to parkland) while being aware of anticipated increases in traffic, noise, and air pollution. Other engineers at the hearing testified about these adverse impacts.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A (retained by Developer F, present case)
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to disclose the anticipated increases in traffic, noise, and air pollution from the waterfront development to the City Planning Board if — and only if — Engineer A's objective professional judgment determined that such impacts constituted 'relevant and pertinent information' to the hearing; Engineer A was not required to volunteer this information if, in good faith professional judgment, it was not relevant and pertinent, but was required to answer all direct questions about such impacts completely and honestly.
Temporal scope
During the City Planning Board public hearing presentation and any subsequent questioning
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Air Pollution
Source Evidence
Source text
the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information.' If they are 'relevant and pertinent,' the engineer has an obligation to disclose the information in any presentation made on the project.
Text references
Engineer A's ethical obligation does not require him to disclose such information if, in his professional judgment, it is not 'relevant and pertinent.'
the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information.' If they are 'relevant and pertinent,' the engineer has an obligation to disclose the information in any presentation made on the project.
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:Engineer_A_Present_Case_Relevance-Conditioned_Traffic_Noise_Air_Pollution_Disclosure a proeth:Client-RetainedPublicHearingEngineerAdverseImpactConditionalDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Present Case Relevance-Conditioned Traffic Noise Air Pollution Disclosure" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case94:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Selective_Emphasis_Permissibility_City_X_Waterfront ;
proeth-core:prevailsOver case94:Engineer_A_Faithful_Agent_Selective_Emphasis_Permissibility_Boundary_BER_Present_Case ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A, retained by Developer F, presented the waterfront development project to the City Planning Board, emphasizing environmental benefits (conversion of industrial waterfront to parkland) while being aware of anticipated increases in traffic, noise, and air pollution. Other engineers at the hearing testified about these adverse impacts." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Relevance_and_Pertinence_Disclosure_Standard_—_Present_Case_Traffic/Noise/Air_Pollution> ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:47:23.287524+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:47:23.287524+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (retained by Developer F, present case)" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client-Retained Public Hearing Engineer Adverse Impact Conditional Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to disclose the anticipated increases in traffic, noise, and air pollution from the waterfront development to the City Planning Board if — and only if — Engineer A's objective professional judgment determined that such impacts constituted 'relevant and pertinent information' to the hearing; Engineer A was not required to volunteer this information if, in good faith professional judgment, it was not relevant and pertinent, but was required to answer all direct questions about such impacts completely and honestly." ;
proeth:sourcetext "the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information.' If they are 'relevant and pertinent,' the engineer has an obligation to disclose the information in any presentation made on the project." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During the City Planning Board public hearing presentation and any subsequent questioning" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's ethical obligation does not require him to disclose such information if, in his professional judgment, it is not 'relevant and pertinent.'",
"the question is whether the traffic, noise, and air pollution issues are 'relevant and pertinent information.' If they are 'relevant and pertinent,' the engineer has an obligation to disclose the information in any presentation made on the project." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.372184"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T20:47:23.287524+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T20:47:23.287524+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T20:55:42.372184
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction