Engineer A Present Case Multi-Witness Hearing Institutional Reliance Non-Volunteering

@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case94:Engineer_A_Present_Case_Multi-Witness_Hearing_Institutional_Reliance_Non-Volunteering a proeth:Multi-WitnessHearingProcessInstitutionalRelianceNon-VolunteeringPermissibilityObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Present Case Multi-Witness Hearing Institutional Reliance Non-Volunteering" ; proeth-core:competesWith case94:Engineer_A_Present_Case_Relevance_Pertinence_Professional_Judgment_Exercise ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case94:Professional_Opinion_Divergence_at_City_X_Planning_Board_Hearing ; proeth-core:prevailsOver case94:Engineer_A_Competing_Public_Goods_Balanced_Disclosure_Assessment_BER_Present_Case ; proeth:casecontext "The City Planning Board hearing included testimony from multiple witnesses: Engineer A (presenting project benefits for Developer F), other engineers (testifying about adverse traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts), and the City Planning Board itself (asking questions). This multi-witness structure provided an institutional mechanism for complete information." ; proeth:compliancestatus "met" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.87" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#Multi-Witness_Hearing_Institutional_Completeness_—_Present_Case_City_Planning_Board> ; proeth:discoveredincase "94" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:47:23.287524+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:47:23.287524+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A (retained by Developer F, present case)" ; proeth:obligationclass "Multi-Witness Hearing Process Institutional Reliance Non-Volunteering Permissibility Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was permitted to rely on the multi-witness structure of the City Planning Board hearing — in which other independent engineers testified about adverse traffic, noise, and air pollution impacts — as an institutional completeness mechanism that partially satisfied the public's interest in complete information, thereby modulating Engineer A's individual proactive disclosure duty, provided Engineer A did not affirmatively suppress or misrepresent such information and answered all direct questions completely and honestly." ; proeth:sourcetext "the present case involves the potential obligation of a single engineer to disclose the fact that an anticipated commercial development will significantly increase traffic, as well as noise and air pollution" ; proeth:temporalscope "During the City Planning Board public hearing" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A's ethical obligation does not require him to disclose such information if, in his professional judgment, it is not 'relevant and pertinent.'", "the present case involves the potential obligation of a single engineer to disclose the fact that an anticipated commercial development will significantly increase traffic, as well as noise and air pollution" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.372506"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .