BER_Case_No_65-9
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#BER_Case_No_65-9
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.98
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 65-9
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review as analogical precedent for the present case involving Engineer A's disclosure obligations
Used in context
Precedent establishing that it is ethical for a consulting engineer to publicly criticize highway route proposals prepared by state highway department engineers and to propose alternative routes; used to ground the principle that engineers can ethically reach different conclusions from the same facts
Source Evidence
Source text
One early example is BER Case No. 65-9
Text references
In determining it was ethical for the principal of a consulting firm to publicly express criticism of proposed highway routes
One early example is BER Case No. 65-9
a state highway department had prepared engineering data on alternate routes for a bypass
the Board used the two earlier cases to show that engineers can ethically reach different conclusions when looking at the same set of facts
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:BER_Case_No_65-9 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER_Case_No_65-9" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.98" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 65-9" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:36:48.238295+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:36:48.238295+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "One early example is BER Case No. 65-9" ;
proeth:textreferences "In determining it was ethical for the principal of a consulting firm to publicly express criticism of proposed highway routes",
"One early example is BER Case No. 65-9",
"a state highway department had prepared engineering data on alternate routes for a bypass",
"the Board used the two earlier cases to show that engineers can ethically reach different conclusions when looking at the same set of facts" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review as analogical precedent for the present case involving Engineer A's disclosure obligations" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Precedent establishing that it is ethical for a consulting engineer to publicly criticize highway route proposals prepared by state highway department engineers and to propose alternative routes; used to ground the principle that engineers can ethically reach different conclusions from the same facts" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.359316"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T20:36:48.238295+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T20:36:48.238295+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T20:55:42.359316
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction