BER_Case_79-2
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#BER_Case_79-2
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.98
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 79-2
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review as primary analogical precedent for the present case's environmental disclosure analysis
Used in context
Precedent establishing that engineers acting on a town council's design request for a sanitary landfill acted ethically, and that a third engineer publicly challenging that design also acted ethically; grounds the principle that environmental and public policy decisions are subject to open public debate and that conflicting professional views between engineers are not ethically problematic
Source Evidence
Source text
Later in BER Case No. 79-2, the Board considered a case involving Engineer A, a town engineer, and Engineer B, a consulting engineer...
Text references
'[t]hat … conflicting public views between engineers in this case should be of no concern.'
'there is no finite answer to the balance or trade-off which is involved in the overall concerns about environmental dangers for particular projects.'
Later in BER Case No. 79-2, the Board considered a case involving Engineer A, a town engineer, and Engineer B, a consulting engineer...
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:BER_Case_79-2 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER_Case_79-2" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.98" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 79-2" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Later in BER Case No. 79-2, the Board considered a case involving Engineer A, a town engineer, and Engineer B, a consulting engineer..." ;
proeth:textreferences "'[t]hat … conflicting public views between engineers in this case should be of no concern.'",
"'there is no finite answer to the balance or trade-off which is involved in the overall concerns about environmental dangers for particular projects.'",
"Later in BER Case No. 79-2, the Board considered a case involving Engineer A, a town engineer, and Engineer B, a consulting engineer..." ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review as primary analogical precedent for the present case's environmental disclosure analysis" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Precedent establishing that engineers acting on a town council's design request for a sanitary landfill acted ethically, and that a third engineer publicly challenging that design also acted ethically; grounds the principle that environmental and public policy decisions are subject to open public debate and that conflicting professional views between engineers are not ethically problematic" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T19:13:05.760767"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T19:13:05.760767
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction