BER_Case_63-6
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#BER_Case_63-6
Properties
Instance of
Confidence
0.97
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review
Document title
NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 63-6
Importance
medium
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review (cited within BER Case 65-9 analysis)
Used in context
Precedent cited within BER Case 65-9 establishing that engineering problems do not always admit of a single correct answer and that equally qualified engineers can honestly differ in their interpretations of the same physical facts
Source Evidence
Source text
Citing earlier BER Case No. 63-6, the Board noted that 'Some aspects of an engineering problem will admit of only one conclusion, such as a mathematical equation, but it is a fallacy to carry this statement to the ultimate conclusion that all engineering problems admit of only one correct answer...'
Text references
Citing earlier BER Case No. 63-6, the Board noted that 'Some aspects of an engineering problem will admit of only one conclusion, such as a mathematical equation, but it is a fallacy to carry this statement to the ultimate conclusion that all engineering problems admit of only one correct answer...'
There may also be honest differences of opinion among equally qualified engineers on the interpretation of the known physical facts.
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:BER_Case_63-6 a proeth:BERCasePrecedent,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER_Case_63-6" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.97" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "NSPE Board of Ethical Review Case No. 63-6" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:resourceclass "BER Case Precedent" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Citing earlier BER Case No. 63-6, the Board noted that 'Some aspects of an engineering problem will admit of only one conclusion, such as a mathematical equation, but it is a fallacy to carry this statement to the ultimate conclusion that all engineering problems admit of only one correct answer...'" ;
proeth:textreferences "Citing earlier BER Case No. 63-6, the Board noted that 'Some aspects of an engineering problem will admit of only one conclusion, such as a mathematical equation, but it is a fallacy to carry this statement to the ultimate conclusion that all engineering problems admit of only one correct answer...'",
"There may also be honest differences of opinion among equally qualified engineers on the interpretation of the known physical facts." ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review (cited within BER Case 65-9 analysis)" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Precedent cited within BER Case 65-9 establishing that engineering problems do not always admit of a single correct answer and that equally qualified engineers can honestly differ in their interpretations of the same physical facts" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T19:13:05.760633"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T18:50:02.648359+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T19:13:05.760633
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction