BER 65-9 Highway Route Public Disagreement
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#BER_65-9_Highway_Route_Public_Disagreement
Properties
Instance of
LegitimateInter-EngineerPublicDisagreementState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#LegitimateInter-EngineerPublicDisagreementState
Active period
From publication of consulting engineer's public letter through public policy resolution of route selection
Affected parties
City official
Consulting engineer (principal of firm)
General public
State highway department engineers
Confidence
0.87
Importance
medium
Subject
Consulting engineer's public disagreement with state highway department engineers over bypass route cost estimates and route selection
Terminated by
Resolution of highway route selection by appropriate public authority
Triggering event
Consulting engineer published open letter disagreeing with highway department cost estimates and proposing alternative Route D
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
a principal of a consulting engineering firm...issued a public letter...discussing the alternative routes
Text references
His letter stated disagreement with the cost estimates of the highway department
a principal of a consulting engineering firm...issued a public letter...discussing the alternative routes
the fact that the consulting engineer's letter disagreed with the cost estimates of the highway department engineers is, in and of itself, not objectionable from an ethical standpoint
TTL
@prefix case94: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/94#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case94:BER_65-9_Highway_Route_Public_Disagreement a proeth:LegitimateInter-EngineerPublicDisagreementState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER 65-9 Highway Route Public Disagreement" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From publication of consulting engineer's public letter through public policy resolution of route selection" ;
proeth:affectedparties "City official",
"Consulting engineer (principal of firm)",
"General public",
"State highway department engineers" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T20:37:32.584640+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "94" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T20:37:32.584640+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:sourcetext "a principal of a consulting engineering firm...issued a public letter...discussing the alternative routes" ;
proeth:stateclass "Legitimate Inter-Engineer Public Disagreement State" ;
proeth:subject "Consulting engineer's public disagreement with state highway department engineers over bypass route cost estimates and route selection" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Resolution of highway route selection by appropriate public authority" ;
proeth:textreferences "His letter stated disagreement with the cost estimates of the highway department",
"a principal of a consulting engineering firm...issued a public letter...discussing the alternative routes",
"the fact that the consulting engineer's letter disagreed with the cost estimates of the highway department engineers is, in and of itself, not objectionable from an ethical standpoint" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Consulting engineer published open letter disagreeing with highway department cost estimates and proposing alternative Route D" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 94 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T20:55:42.362376"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 94 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
94
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T20:37:32.584640+00:00
First case
94
Generated
2026-02-28T20:37:32.584640+00:00
Attributed to
Case 94 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T20:55:42.362376
Generated by
ProEthica Case 94 Extraction