Engineer B Peer-Reviewed Engineer Subject to Safety Code Findings
R · Role
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/93#Engineer_B_Peer-Reviewed_Engineer_Subject_to_Safety_Code_Findings
Definition
Engineer whose firm was visited by Review Engineer A as part of an organized peer review program; design work found to potentially violate state and local safety code requirements, triggering collegial discussion obligations.
Properties
Instance of
Peer-ReviewedEngineerSubjecttoSafetyCodeFindings
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Peer-ReviewedEngineerSubjecttoSafetyCodeFindings
Attributes
| license | Professional Engineer |
| review_context | Organized peer review program |
| finding | Potential safety code violations in recent design projects |
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Relationships
| type | reviewed_by |
| target | Review Engineer A Peer Review Safety Violation Discoverer |
Role category
professional_peer
Source Evidence
Source text
Review Engineer A visited Engineer B's firm
Text references
Engineer B's work may be in violation of state and local safety code requirements and could endanger public health, safety, and welfare
Review Engineer A visited Engineer B's firm
the appropriate action would be for Review Engineer A to immediately discuss these issues with Engineer B
TTL
@prefix case93: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/93#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case93:Engineer_B_Peer-Reviewed_Engineer_Subject_to_Safety_Code_Findings a proeth:Peer-ReviewedEngineerSubjecttoSafetyCodeFindings,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer B Peer-Reviewed Engineer Subject to Safety Code Findings" ;
proeth:attributes "{'license': 'Professional Engineer', 'review_context': 'Organized peer review program', 'finding': 'Potential safety code violations in recent design projects'}" ;
proeth:caseinvolvement "Engineer whose firm was visited by Review Engineer A as part of an organized peer review program; design work found to potentially violate state and local safety code requirements, triggering collegial discussion obligations." ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Role" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "93" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T15:08:20.848465+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "93" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T15:08:20.848465+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:relationships "{'type': 'reviewed_by', 'target': 'Review Engineer A Peer Review Safety Violation Discoverer'}" ;
proeth:rolecategory "professional_peer" ;
proeth:roleclass "Peer-Reviewed Engineer Subject to Safety Code Findings" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Review Engineer A visited Engineer B's firm" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer B's work may be in violation of state and local safety code requirements and could endanger public health, safety, and welfare",
"Review Engineer A visited Engineer B's firm",
"the appropriate action would be for Review Engineer A to immediately discuss these issues with Engineer B" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 93 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T15:27:04.015934"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 93 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
93
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T15:08:20.848465+00:00
First case
93
Generated
2026-02-28T15:08:20.848465+00:00
Attributed to
Case 93 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T15:27:04.015934
Generated by
ProEthica Case 93 Extraction