Collegial Notification Before Reporting Standard — Present Case Application
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/93#Collegial_Notification_Before_Reporting_Standard_—_Present_Case_Application
Properties
Instance of
CollegialNotificationBeforeReportingStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CollegialNotificationBeforeReportingStandard
Confidence
0.85
Created by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review (derived from BER Case 96-8 and professional practice norms)
Document title
Professional Norm of Collegial Direct Communication Prior to Regulatory Reporting
Importance
high
Used by
NSPE Board of Ethical Review in guiding Engineer A's response to Engineer X's potential violation
Used in context
Applied by the Board to conclude that Engineer A's first obligation upon discovering Engineer X's failure to obtain a certificate of authority is to communicate directly with Engineer X to explain the requirement and seek voluntary compliance, rather than immediately reporting to the state board
Source Evidence
Source text
part of the discussion between Engineer A and Engineer X would presumably include an explanation by Engineer A of the reasons for the certificate of authority requirement
Text references
Assuming Engineer X is a reasonable and prudent individual, we believe Engineer A's counsel to Engineer X would be all that would be necessary to convince Engineer X to take all appropriate steps to obtain the certificate of authority
part of the discussion between Engineer A and Engineer X would presumably include an explanation by Engineer A of the reasons for the certificate of authority requirement
potential violators should first be advised of the potential violation especially when a professional colleague, albeit a competitor, becomes aware of the potential infraction
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/93#Collegial_Notification_Before_Reporting_Standard_—_Present_Case_Application> a proeth:CollegialNotificationBeforeReportingStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Collegial Notification Before Reporting Standard — Present Case Application" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review (derived from BER Case 96-8 and professional practice norms)" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "93" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Professional Norm of Collegial Direct Communication Prior to Regulatory Reporting" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T15:07:59.510399+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "93" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T15:07:59.510399+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Collegial Notification Before Reporting Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "part of the discussion between Engineer A and Engineer X would presumably include an explanation by Engineer A of the reasons for the certificate of authority requirement" ;
proeth:textreferences "Assuming Engineer X is a reasonable and prudent individual, we believe Engineer A's counsel to Engineer X would be all that would be necessary to convince Engineer X to take all appropriate steps to obtain the certificate of authority",
"part of the discussion between Engineer A and Engineer X would presumably include an explanation by Engineer A of the reasons for the certificate of authority requirement",
"potential violators should first be advised of the potential violation especially when a professional colleague, albeit a competitor, becomes aware of the potential infraction" ;
proeth:usedby "NSPE Board of Ethical Review in guiding Engineer A's response to Engineer X's potential violation" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Applied by the Board to conclude that Engineer A's first obligation upon discovering Engineer X's failure to obtain a certificate of authority is to communicate directly with Engineer X to explain the requirement and seek voluntary compliance, rather than immediately reporting to the state board" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 93 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T15:27:04.012819"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 93 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
93
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T15:07:59.510399+00:00
First case
93
Generated
2026-02-28T15:07:59.510399+00:00
Attributed to
Case 93 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T15:27:04.012819
Generated by
ProEthica Case 93 Extraction