BER 96-8 Peer Review Confidentiality vs. Safety Reporting Tension
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/93#BER_96-8_Peer_Review_Confidentiality_vs._Safety_Reporting_Tension
Properties
Instance of
PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementBoundState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementBoundState
Active period
From Review Engineer A's signing of the confidentiality agreement through the Board's determination that safety reporting supersedes confidentiality
Affected parties
Engineer B
Peer review program
Review Engineer A
Confidence
0.95
Importance
high
Subject
Review Engineer A's confidentiality obligation under the peer review program agreement
Terminated by
Board determination that public safety violation reporting obligation supersedes confidentiality when genuine danger exists
Triggering event
Review Engineer A signing the confidentiality agreement as a condition of peer reviewer appointment
Urgency level
medium
Source Evidence
Source text
Review Engineer A was asked to sign a 'confidentiality agreement' whereby he agreed not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms
Text references
Review Engineer A was asked to sign a 'confidentiality agreement' whereby he agreed not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms
the Board also disposed of the confidentiality issue, noting that if in fact there was truly a violation that posed a serious danger to the public health and safety, the confidentiality issue would become a secondary matter
TTL
@prefix case93: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/93#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case93:BER_96-8_Peer_Review_Confidentiality_vs._Safety_Reporting_Tension a proeth:PeerReviewConfidentialityAgreementBoundState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "BER 96-8 Peer Review Confidentiality vs. Safety Reporting Tension" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From Review Engineer A's signing of the confidentiality agreement through the Board's determination that safety reporting supersedes confidentiality" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Engineer B",
"Peer review program",
"Review Engineer A" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.95" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "93" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-28T15:08:41.541825+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "93" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-28T15:08:41.541825+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Review Engineer A was asked to sign a 'confidentiality agreement' whereby he agreed not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms" ;
proeth:stateclass "Peer Review Confidentiality Agreement Bound State" ;
proeth:subject "Review Engineer A's confidentiality obligation under the peer review program agreement" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Board determination that public safety violation reporting obligation supersedes confidentiality when genuine danger exists" ;
proeth:textreferences "Review Engineer A was asked to sign a 'confidentiality agreement' whereby he agreed not to disclose confidential information involving peer-reviewed firms",
"the Board also disposed of the confidentiality issue, noting that if in fact there was truly a violation that posed a serious danger to the public health and safety, the confidentiality issue would become a secondary matter" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Review Engineer A signing the confidentiality agreement as a condition of peer reviewer appointment" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "medium" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 93 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T15:27:04.016425"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 93 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
93
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-28T15:08:41.541825+00:00
First case
93
Generated
2026-02-28T15:08:41.541825+00:00
Attributed to
Case 93 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T15:27:04.016425
Generated by
ProEthica Case 93 Extraction