Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Overflow
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/92#Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Overflow
Properties
Instance of
EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard
Confidence
0.9
Created by
NSPE / professional engineering ethics bodies
Document title
Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A after Administrator C dismisses her overflow warnings with 'we will face the problem when it comes'
Used in context
Governs Engineer A's obligations after City Administrator C rejects her recommendations about inadequate sanitary system capacity, including her duty to document, escalate, and determine whether the refusal creates a public safety threat requiring action beyond the client relationship.
Version
Current
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A notifies Administrator C of the inadequate capacity of the plant and beds to handle the potential overflow during the rainy season and offers possible solutions.
Text references
City Administrator C has told Engineer A that 'we will face the problem when it comes.'
Engineer A notifies Administrator C of the inadequate capacity of the plant and beds to handle the potential overflow during the rainy season and offers possible solutions.
TTL
@prefix case92: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/92#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case92:Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Overflow a proeth:EngineerSafetyRecommendationRejectionStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Safety-Recommendation-Rejection-Standard-Overflow" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:createdby "NSPE / professional engineering ethics bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "92" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T13:31:24.061287+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "92" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T13:31:24.061287+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Safety Recommendation Rejection Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A notifies Administrator C of the inadequate capacity of the plant and beds to handle the potential overflow during the rainy season and offers possible solutions." ;
proeth:textreferences "City Administrator C has told Engineer A that 'we will face the problem when it comes.'",
"Engineer A notifies Administrator C of the inadequate capacity of the plant and beds to handle the potential overflow during the rainy season and offers possible solutions." ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A after Administrator C dismisses her overflow warnings with 'we will face the problem when it comes'" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs Engineer A's obligations after City Administrator C rejects her recommendations about inadequate sanitary system capacity, including her duty to document, escalate, and determine whether the refusal creates a public safety threat requiring action beyond the client relationship." ;
proeth:version "Current" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 92 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T14:00:16.251125"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 92 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
92
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T13:31:24.061287+00:00
First case
92
Generated
2026-03-01T13:31:24.061287+00:00
Attributed to
Case 92 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T14:00:16.251125
Generated by
ProEthica Case 92 Extraction