Sub-Professional Bidding Permissibility for PE Firm
Individual
770482b4
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/90#Sub-Professional_Bidding_Permissibility_for_PE_Firm
Properties
Parent
Sub-ProfessionalServiceCompetitiveBiddingPermissibilityPrinciple
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Sub-ProfessionalServiceCompetitiveBiddingPermissibilityPrinciple
Appliedto
Written competitive bid for work comprised solely of sub-professional services
Balancingwith
PE Identity Non-Exploitation in Sub-Professional Commercial Competition Principle
Professional Ethics Obligation Persistence in Sub-Professional Practice Principle
Concept Category
Principle
Concreteexpression
The PE firm is ethically permitted to submit the written competitive bid for the sub-professional work because: (a) the work is related to professional engineering services, (b) the firm has demonstrated capacity to perform such work on occasion, and (c) competitive bidding in this context is lawful and consistent with free market norms
Confidence
0.82
Importance
high
Interpretation
Permissibility is conditional on the firm's honest representation of its capabilities and its refraining from exploiting PE credentials to gain unfair advantage over non-PE commercial competitors
Invokedby
PE-Principal Engineering Firm Bidding Sub-Professional Work
Principleclass
Sub-Professional Service Competitive Bidding Permissibility Principle
Tensionresolution
The firm may bid; the ethical obligations that follow concern the manner of bidding and the accuracy of representations made in the bid
Source Evidence
Source Text
The firm is invited to submit a written bid for work comprised solely of sub-professional services.
Text References
An engineering firm in which all the principals are professional engineers provides services on occasion of a type and nature regarded as sub-professional in character, although related to professional engineering services.
The firm is invited to submit a written bid for work comprised solely of sub-professional services.
TTL
@prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proethica_case_90: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/90> .
<http://proethica.org/ontology/case/90#Sub-Professional_Bidding_Permissibility_for_PE_Firm> a owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Sub-Professional Bidding Permissibility for PE Firm" ;
rdfs:subClassOf <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Sub-ProfessionalServiceCompetitiveBiddingPermissibilityPrinciple> .
Metadata
Ontology
Type
Individual
Content Hash
770482b4813b1a7f...Last Updated
2026-03-08 16:29
Extraction Provenance
Discovered in Case
90
Discovered in Pass
2
Discovered in Section
facts
First Discovered
2026-03-02T16:06:53.623243+00:00
First Case
90
Generated
2026-03-02T16:06:53.623243+00:00
Attributed To
Case 90 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T16:20:56.410301
Generated By
ProEthica Case 90 Extraction