PE Firm Ethics Code Scope Non-Application to Sub-Professional Bid
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/90#PE_Firm_Ethics_Code_Scope_Non-Application_to_Sub-Professional_Bid
Properties
Instance of
EthicsCodeScopeLimitationtoProfessionalEngineeringPracticeObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EthicsCodeScopeLimitationtoProfessionalEngineeringPracticeObligation
Case context
A PE firm whose principals are all licensed engineers has been invited to submit a written competitive bid for work that is solely sub-professional in character; the question is whether ethics code provisions restrict or govern that bid.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.91
Importance
high
Obligated party
PE-Principal Engineering Firm Bidding Sub-Professional Work and the ethics adjudicatory body
Obligation statement
The PE firm and the ethics body are obligated to recognize that the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct do not apply to the sub-professional work for which the firm has been invited to bid, because that work is business/commercial in character rather than professional engineering practice.
Temporal scope
At the time of evaluating whether ethics code provisions apply to the sub-professional bid invitation
Source Evidence
Source text
It is clear that the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct are intended to apply only to professional engineering practice, and not to business activities in which a professional engineer may engage, either as his sole activity or in conjunction with his engineering practice.
Text references
It is clear that the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct are intended to apply only to professional engineering practice, and not to business activities in which a professional engineer may engage, either as his sole activity or in conjunction with his engineering practice.
This situation is not relative to the present case which relates only to those contracts which are solely of a sub-professional nature.
TTL
@prefix case90: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/90#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case90:PE_Firm_Ethics_Code_Scope_Non-Application_to_Sub-Professional_Bid a proeth:EthicsCodeScopeLimitationtoProfessionalEngineeringPracticeObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "PE Firm Ethics Code Scope Non-Application to Sub-Professional Bid" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case90:PE_Firm_Professional_Dignity_Preservation_in_Sub-Professional_Commercial_Activities,
case90:PE_Firm_Sub-Professional_Bid_Ethics_Code_Persistence ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case90:Engineering_Code_Non-Applicability_to_Sub-Professional_Activities ;
proeth:casecontext "A PE firm whose principals are all licensed engineers has been invited to submit a written competitive bid for work that is solely sub-professional in character; the question is whether ethics code provisions restrict or govern that bid." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.91" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case90:Ethics_Code_Scope_Limitation_to_Professional_Practice_in_Sub-Professional_Bidding_Case ;
proeth:discoveredincase "90" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-02T16:14:04.571072+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "90" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-02T16:14:04.571072+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "PE-Principal Engineering Firm Bidding Sub-Professional Work and the ethics adjudicatory body" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Ethics Code Scope Limitation to Professional Engineering Practice Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "The PE firm and the ethics body are obligated to recognize that the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct do not apply to the sub-professional work for which the firm has been invited to bid, because that work is business/commercial in character rather than professional engineering practice." ;
proeth:sourcetext "It is clear that the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct are intended to apply only to professional engineering practice, and not to business activities in which a professional engineer may engage, either as his sole activity or in conjunction with his engineering practice." ;
proeth:temporalscope "At the time of evaluating whether ethics code provisions apply to the sub-professional bid invitation" ;
proeth:textreferences "It is clear that the Canons of Ethics and Rules of Professional Conduct are intended to apply only to professional engineering practice, and not to business activities in which a professional engineer may engage, either as his sole activity or in conjunction with his engineering practice.",
"This situation is not relative to the present case which relates only to those contracts which are solely of a sub-professional nature." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 90 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-02T16:20:56.417773"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 90 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
90
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-03-02T16:14:04.571072+00:00
First case
90
Generated
2026-03-02T16:14:04.571072+00:00
Attributed to
Case 90 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-02T16:20:56.417773
Generated by
ProEthica Case 90 Extraction