Internal Error Concern Escalation Obligation Engineer T Self-Assessment
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/9#Internal_Error_Concern_Escalation_Obligation_Engineer_T_Self-Assessment
Properties
Instance of
GraduatedInternalEscalationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#GraduatedInternalEscalationObligation
Case context
Engineer T felt personal responsibility for the accident and believed an ethics obligation to acknowledge error existed; Engineer T escalated the concern to Engineer B before any external legal proceedings required disclosure, enabling an internal institutional determination to be made.
Compliance status
met
Confidence
0.81
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer T
Obligation statement
Engineer T was obligated, upon forming a good-faith belief after the construction accident that the design approach may have constituted a professional error requiring acknowledgment, to promptly bring that concern to Engineer B (Chief Structural Engineer) with full factual disclosure — including the post-accident site visit findings and the belief that an ethics obligation to acknowledge error existed — so that the firm could make a considered institutional determination.
Temporal scope
Following the construction accident and Engineer T's post-accident site visit, before the filing of the lawsuit
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Professional Accountability Invoked By Engineer T Self-Assessment
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer T felt some personal responsibility for the accident.
Text references
Engineer T felt some personal responsibility for the accident.
Engineer T met with XYZ's Chief Structural Engineer, Engineer B, explained the situation, and expressed a belief that a design error – i.e., not exploring alternative, safer design concepts – had been made and the NSPE Code of Ethics required that the error be acknowledged.
Engineer T reviewed and discussed the project history, including the conversation with Engineer B relative to T's feeling there was, potentially, a professional obligation to acknowledge an error.
TTL
@prefix case9: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/9#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case9:Internal_Error_Concern_Escalation_Obligation_Engineer_T_Self-Assessment a proeth:GraduatedInternalEscalationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Internal Error Concern Escalation Obligation Engineer T Self-Assessment" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case9:Supervisory_Error_Characterization_Authority_Obligation_Engineer_B_XYZ ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer T felt personal responsibility for the accident and believed an ethics obligation to acknowledge error existed; Engineer T escalated the concern to Engineer B before any external legal proceedings required disclosure, enabling an internal institutional determination to be made." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "met" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.81" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case9:Professional_Accountability_Invoked_By_Engineer_T_Self-Assessment ;
proeth:discoveredincase "9" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-24T22:35:24.786445+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "9" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-24T22:35:24.786445+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer T" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Graduated Internal Escalation Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer T was obligated, upon forming a good-faith belief after the construction accident that the design approach may have constituted a professional error requiring acknowledgment, to promptly bring that concern to Engineer B (Chief Structural Engineer) with full factual disclosure — including the post-accident site visit findings and the belief that an ethics obligation to acknowledge error existed — so that the firm could make a considered institutional determination." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer T felt some personal responsibility for the accident." ;
proeth:temporalscope "Following the construction accident and Engineer T's post-accident site visit, before the filing of the lawsuit" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer T felt some personal responsibility for the accident.",
"Engineer T met with XYZ's Chief Structural Engineer, Engineer B, explained the situation, and expressed a belief that a design error – i.e., not exploring alternative, safer design concepts – had been made and the NSPE Code of Ethics required that the error be acknowledged.",
"Engineer T reviewed and discussed the project history, including the conversation with Engineer B relative to T's feeling there was, potentially, a professional obligation to acknowledge an error." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 9 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T22:41:24.556512"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 9 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
9
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-24T22:35:24.786445+00:00
First case
9
Generated
2026-02-24T22:35:24.786445+00:00
Attributed to
Case 9 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-24T22:41:24.556512
Generated by
ProEthica Case 9 Extraction