DP4

@prefix case9: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/9#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-cases: <http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case9:DP4 a proeth-cases:DecisionPoint, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "DP4" ; proeth:decisionPointId "DP4" ; proeth:decisionQuestion "Should Engineer T and Engineer B jointly conclude that no professional error was made in the structural design, given that a safer alternative design approach was recognized only after a construction worker was seriously injured?" ; proeth:focus "Engineer T and Engineer B: Joint Error Determination After Post-Accident Recognition of Safer Alternative Design" ; proeth:option1 "Jointly conclude that no professional error was made, relying on standard-of-care compliance, contractual safety allocation to the contractor, and Engineer T's recognized competence boundary in construction safety" ; proeth:option2 "Acknowledge that a professional error or missed opportunity occurred in failing to explore safer alternative design concepts before finalizing documents that explicitly flagged the constrained-access condition, and document that acknowledgment within XYZ's quality management system" ; proeth:option3 "Refer the error characterization question to an independent, disinterested senior engineer outside XYZ Consulting Engineers before reaching any joint determination, in order to insulate the conclusion from Engineer B's institutional conflict of interest" ; proeth:roleLabel "Engineer T and Engineer B Senior Engineering Supervisor" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-24T22:57:43.526821"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 9 Extraction" .