DP3

DecisionPoint
http://proethica.org/ontology/cases#DecisionPoint

DP3

Should Engineer T formally document the post-accident recognition that a safer alternative design approach existed — framed as a forward-looking lessons-learned finding rather than a backward-looking error admission — within XYZ's internal quality management systems and communicate that insight to colleagues and the profession, regardless of the outcome of the legal proceedings and the joint 'no error' determination?

Engineer T's obligation, following the post-accident recognition that a safer alternative design approach existed, to formally document that insight within XYZ Consulting Engineers' quality management or lessons-learned systems — independent of the legal proceedings and the backward-looking error determination — so that the safety-relevant professional finding is preserved for the profession rather than absorbed entirely into the litigation record.

Formally document the post-accident recognition of the safer alternative design approach within XYZ's quality management or lessons-learned systems, framed as a forward-looking design improvement insight, and communicate the finding to colleagues and the profession independent of the legal proceedings

Defer any documentation or communication of the post-accident design insight until after the legal proceedings conclude, to avoid creating discoverable records that could be recharacterized as implicit error admissions in the pending litigation

Engineer T