Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard-Instance
Rs · Resource
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard-Instance
Properties
Instance of
EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard
Confidence
0.88
Created by
Professional engineering ethics review bodies
Document title
Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard
Importance
high
Used by
Engineer A in determining continuing obligations after client rejection of on-site representative recommendation
Used in context
Governs whether Engineer A's obligation to protect public safety requires escalation beyond the client relationship after the client rejects the safety recommendation, and whether proceeding with the project without the recommended safeguard is ethically permissible.
Version
Current
Source Evidence
Source text
the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
Text references
Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project
the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard-Instance a proeth:EngineerPublicSafetyEscalationStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer-Public-Safety-Escalation-Standard-Instance" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Resource" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:createdby "Professional engineering ethics review bodies" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:documenttitle "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:07:06.532223+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:07:06.532223+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:resourceclass "Engineer Public Safety Escalation Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A proceeds with his work on the project",
"the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:usedby "Engineer A in determining continuing obligations after client rejection of on-site representative recommendation" ;
proeth:usedincontext "Governs whether Engineer A's obligation to protect public safety requires escalation beyond the client relationship after the client rejects the safety recommendation, and whether proceeding with the project without the recommended safeguard is ethically permissible." ;
proeth:version "Current" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.063429"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:07:06.532223+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:07:06.532223+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.063429
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction