Client Rejection of On-Site Safety Representative on Cost Grounds
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#Client_Rejection_of_On-Site_Safety_Representative_on_Cost_Grounds
Properties
Instance of
ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState
Active period
From client's cost-based refusal through Engineer A's decision to proceed without the safeguard
Affected parties
Client
Construction workers
Engineer A
Public
Confidence
0.98
Importance
high
Subject
Client's refusal to fund a full-time on-site project representative recommended by Engineer A
Terminated by
Client reversal of decision, Engineer A disassociation, or project completion
Triggering event
Client indicates the project would be too costly if a full-time on-site representative were hired
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
Text references
After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired
TTL
@prefix case89: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/89#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case89:Client_Rejection_of_On-Site_Safety_Representative_on_Cost_Grounds a proeth:ClientCost-DrivenSafetyOversightRejectionState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Client Rejection of On-Site Safety Representative on Cost Grounds" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From client's cost-based refusal through Engineer A's decision to proceed without the safeguard" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client",
"Construction workers",
"Engineer A",
"Public" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.98" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "89" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:stateclass "Client Cost-Driven Safety Oversight Rejection State" ;
proeth:subject "Client's refusal to fund a full-time on-site project representative recommended by Engineer A" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Client reversal of decision, Engineer A disassociation, or project completion" ;
proeth:textreferences "After reviewing the completed project plans and costs, the client indicates to Engineer A that the project would be too costly if such a representative were hired" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Client indicates the project would be too costly if a full-time on-site representative were hired" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 89 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-03-01T18:38:27.064330"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 89 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
89
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00
First case
89
Generated
2026-03-01T18:07:12.075933+00:00
Attributed to
Case 89 Extraction
Generated
2026-03-01T18:38:27.064330
Generated by
ProEthica Case 89 Extraction