Environmental Stewardship Invoked By Engineer A Tidal Saltmarsh
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Environmental_Stewardship_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Tidal_Saltmarsh
Properties
Instance of
EnvironmentalStewardshipinEngineeringPractice
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#EnvironmentalStewardshipinEngineeringPractice
Applied to
Tidal saltmarsh crossing design
Upstream hydraulic conditions
Balancing with
Client Cost Management Preferences
Concrete expression
Engineer A's design work involves upgrading a tidal crossing through a tidal saltmarsh, requiring consideration of the hydraulic and ecological impacts of increasing the crossing's hydraulic capacity on the saltmarsh system and upstream hydrological conditions
Confidence
0.85
Importance
medium
Interpretation
In this context, environmental stewardship requires Engineer A to assess the ecological and hydraulic impacts of the tidal crossing upgrade on the saltmarsh system and to recommend design alternatives that minimize those impacts, including impacts on upstream flood risk
Invoked by
Engineer A Tidal Crossing Infrastructure Design Engineer
Tension resolution
Environmental stewardship obligations reinforce rather than conflict with the public welfare obligation in this case, as both require assessment of the hydraulic impacts of the tidal crossing upgrade
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A is a consulting engineer representing Client B, a developer who is proposing to develop a health care facility that requires a significant upgrade to the property's access road that crosses a tidal saltmarsh
Text references
Engineer A is a consulting engineer representing Client B, a developer who is proposing to develop a health care facility that requires a significant upgrade to the property's access road that crosses a tidal saltmarsh
Engineer A's scope includes design and local permitting of the roadway, including an upgrade of the tidal crossing from a small culvert to a small bridge, increasing its hydraulic capacity
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Environmental_Stewardship_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Tidal_Saltmarsh a proeth:EnvironmentalStewardshipinEngineeringPractice,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Environmental Stewardship Invoked By Engineer A Tidal Saltmarsh" ;
proeth:appliedto "Tidal saltmarsh crossing design",
"Upstream hydraulic conditions" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client Cost Management Preferences" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A's design work involves upgrading a tidal crossing through a tidal saltmarsh, requiring consideration of the hydraulic and ecological impacts of increasing the crossing's hydraulic capacity on the saltmarsh system and upstream hydrological conditions" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:13:22.311648+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:13:22.311648+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "medium" ;
proeth:interpretation "In this context, environmental stewardship requires Engineer A to assess the ecological and hydraulic impacts of the tidal crossing upgrade on the saltmarsh system and to recommend design alternatives that minimize those impacts, including impacts on upstream flood risk" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Tidal Crossing Infrastructure Design Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Environmental Stewardship in Engineering Practice" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A is a consulting engineer representing Client B, a developer who is proposing to develop a health care facility that requires a significant upgrade to the property's access road that crosses a tidal saltmarsh" ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Environmental stewardship obligations reinforce rather than conflict with the public welfare obligation in this case, as both require assessment of the hydraulic impacts of the tidal crossing upgrade" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A is a consulting engineer representing Client B, a developer who is proposing to develop a health care facility that requires a significant upgrade to the property's access road that crosses a tidal saltmarsh",
"Engineer A's scope includes design and local permitting of the roadway, including an upgrade of the tidal crossing from a small culvert to a small bridge, increasing its hydraulic capacity" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.062896"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:13:22.311648+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:13:22.311648+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.062896
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction