Engineer A Regulatory Report Submission Proposal Tidal Crossing Escalation
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Regulatory_Report_Submission_Proposal_Tidal_Crossing_Escalation
Properties
Instance of
RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation
Case context
As the second step in the graduated escalation sequence, after Client B refuses to authorize the specialized analysis, Engineer A must propose the regulatory report pathway before withdrawal.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.93
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated, if Client B remained unconvinced after initial engagement, to propose to Client B that Engineer A document the identified public health, safety, and welfare concern in an engineering report for submission to and consideration by regulatory agencies and the public.
Temporal scope
After Client B's refusal of the initial engagement discussions, before withdrawal
Relationships
derivedFromPrinciple
Post-Client-Refusal Escalation Assessment Obligation Triggered by Client Bs Refusal
Source Evidence
Source text
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public.
Text references
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Regulatory_Report_Submission_Proposal_Tidal_Crossing_Escalation a proeth:RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Regulatory Report Submission Proposal Tidal Crossing Escalation" ;
proeth:casecontext "As the second step in the graduated escalation sequence, after Client B refuses to authorize the specialized analysis, Engineer A must propose the regulatory report pathway before withdrawal." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.93" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Post-Client-Refusal_Escalation_Assessment_Obligation_Triggered_by_Client_Bs_Refusal ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Regulatory Report Submission Proposal as Escalation Step Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated, if Client B remained unconvinced after initial engagement, to propose to Client B that Engineer A document the identified public health, safety, and welfare concern in an engineering report for submission to and consideration by regulatory agencies and the public." ;
proeth:sourcetext "If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public." ;
proeth:temporalscope "After Client B's refusal of the initial engagement discussions, before withdrawal" ;
proeth:textreferences "If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.865257"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.865257
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction