Engineer A Regulatory Report Submission Proposal Escalation Tidal Crossing
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Regulatory_Report_Submission_Proposal_Escalation_Tidal_Crossing
Properties
Instance of
RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation
Case context
Client B has refused to authorize the specialized hydrologic and hydraulic analysis; Engineer A must propose the intermediate escalation step of a written risk report for regulatory submission before considering withdrawal.
Compliance status
unmet
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A is obligated, as a graduated escalation step after Client B's refusal to authorize the specialized analysis, to propose to Client B that Engineer A document the identified upstream flood risk in a written engineering report for submission to and consideration by the applicable regulatory authorities and the public during the permitting process.
Temporal scope
After Client B's refusal to authorize the specialized analysis and before any decision to withdraw from the project
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client B Deferral of Third-Party Risk Analysis
Source Evidence
Source text
Client B directs Engineer A to proceed without the costly analysis unless and until such an analysis is requested by the applicable regulatory authorities.
Text references
Client B directs Engineer A to proceed without the costly analysis unless and until such an analysis is requested by the applicable regulatory authorities.
anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Regulatory_Report_Submission_Proposal_Escalation_Tidal_Crossing a proeth:RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Regulatory Report Submission Proposal Escalation Tidal Crossing" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case88:Client_B_Deferral_of_Third-Party_Risk_Analysis ;
proeth:casecontext "Client B has refused to authorize the specialized hydrologic and hydraulic analysis; Engineer A must propose the intermediate escalation step of a written risk report for regulatory submission before considering withdrawal." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unmet" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Post-Client-Refusal_Escalation_Assessment_Obligation_Invoked_by_BER_Discussion_Section ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Regulatory Report Submission Proposal as Escalation Step Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A is obligated, as a graduated escalation step after Client B's refusal to authorize the specialized analysis, to propose to Client B that Engineer A document the identified upstream flood risk in a written engineering report for submission to and consideration by the applicable regulatory authorities and the public during the permitting process." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Client B directs Engineer A to proceed without the costly analysis unless and until such an analysis is requested by the applicable regulatory authorities." ;
proeth:temporalscope "After Client B's refusal to authorize the specialized analysis and before any decision to withdraw from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Client B directs Engineer A to proceed without the costly analysis unless and until such an analysis is requested by the applicable regulatory authorities.",
"anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.857406"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T14:13:00.331319+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.857406
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction