Engineer A Regulatory Report Submission Proposal Client B Tidal Crossing
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Regulatory_Report_Submission_Proposal_Client_B_Tidal_Crossing
Properties
Instance of
RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation
Case context
Client B refused to authorize the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis; Engineer A's graduated escalation required proposing written documentation of the concern for regulatory submission before withdrawing from the project.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.88
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated, as an intermediate escalation step after Client B refused to authorize the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis, to propose to Client B that Engineer A document the identified upstream flood risk concern in a written engineering report for submission to and consideration by regulatory agencies and the public.
Temporal scope
After Client B's refusal of the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis and before project withdrawal
Relationships
Source Evidence
Source text
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public.
Text references
If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Regulatory_Report_Submission_Proposal_Client_B_Tidal_Crossing a proeth:RegulatoryReportSubmissionProposalasEscalationStepObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Regulatory Report Submission Proposal Client B Tidal Crossing" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Client-Directed_Deferral_of_Third-Party_Risk_Analysis_—_Upstream_Flood_Study> ;
proeth:casecontext "Client B refused to authorize the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis; Engineer A's graduated escalation required proposing written documentation of the concern for regulatory submission before withdrawing from the project." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.88" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Post-Client-Refusal_Escalation_Assessment_Obligation_Invoked_by_BER_Discussion_Section ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Regulatory Report Submission Proposal as Escalation Step Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated, as an intermediate escalation step after Client B refused to authorize the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis, to propose to Client B that Engineer A document the identified upstream flood risk concern in a written engineering report for submission to and consideration by regulatory agencies and the public." ;
proeth:sourcetext "If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public." ;
proeth:temporalscope "After Client B's refusal of the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis and before project withdrawal" ;
proeth:textreferences "If Client B remains unconvinced, Engineer A should propose to Client B that engineer a provides the potential concern that may necessitate more detailed evaluation in an engineering report for consideration by regulatory agencies and the public." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.072714"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.072714
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction