Engineer A Conditional Project Withdrawal Tidal Crossing Both Avenues Refused

O · Obligation Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Conditional_Project_Withdrawal_Tidal_Crossing_Both_Avenues_Refused
Properties
Instance of
ConditionalProjectWithdrawalAfterClientRefusalofSafetyDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ConditionalProjectWithdrawalAfterClientRefusalofSafetyDisclosureObligation
Case context
Withdrawal is the last resort in the graduated escalation sequence after Client B forecloses all avenues for addressing the identified public safety risks to upstream homeowners.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.94
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to withdraw from the tidal crossing project if Client B refused both the opportunity to conduct the recommended specialized analysis and the opportunity to submit an engineering report documenting the concern to regulatory agencies.
Temporal scope
After Client B refuses both the specialized analysis and the regulatory report proposal
Source Evidence
Source text
Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project.

Text references
Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . case88:Engineer_A_Conditional_Project_Withdrawal_Tidal_Crossing_Both_Avenues_Refused a proeth:ConditionalProjectWithdrawalAfterClientRefusalofSafetyDisclosureObligation, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Engineer A Conditional Project Withdrawal Tidal Crossing Both Avenues Refused" ; proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case88:Engineer_A_Conditional_Withdrawal_Obligation ; proeth:casecontext "Withdrawal is the last resort in the graduated escalation sequence after Client B forecloses all avenues for addressing the identified public safety risks to upstream homeowners." ; proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ; proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ; proeth:confidence "0.94" ; proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Post-Client-Refusal_Escalation_Assessment_Obligation_Invoked_by_BER_Discussion_Section ; proeth:discoveredincase "88" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ; proeth:obligationclass "Conditional Project Withdrawal After Client Refusal of Safety Disclosure Obligation" ; proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to withdraw from the tidal crossing project if Client B refused both the opportunity to conduct the recommended specialized analysis and the opportunity to submit an engineering report documenting the concern to regulatory agencies." ; proeth:sourcetext "Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project." ; proeth:temporalscope "After Client B refuses both the specialized analysis and the regulatory report proposal" ; proeth:textreferences "Failing agreement by Client B to either of these courses of action the BER believes that Engineer A should withdraw from the project." ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.865395"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T14:21:57.794732+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.865395
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction