Engineer A Competing Public Goods Healthcare Upstream Community Balanced Advisory
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Competing_Public_Goods_Healthcare_Upstream_Community_Balanced_Advisory
Properties
Instance of
CompetingPublicGoodsBalancedAdvisoryDisclosureObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#CompetingPublicGoodsBalancedAdvisoryDisclosureObligation
Case context
Engineer A identified a conflict between the public benefit of a new healthcare facility and the upstream community flood risk, anticipating this to be a difficult question in public hearings.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.85
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to explicitly acknowledge and address in any regulatory submission or advisory report the genuine conflict between the public benefit of the proposed healthcare facility — requiring the tidal crossing upgrade — and the welfare of the approximately twenty upstream homeowners facing accelerated flood risk and uninhabitability, presenting the tradeoffs completely and objectively so that the regulatory authority can make an informed decision.
Temporal scope
During preparation of regulatory submissions and public hearing materials
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Competing Duties — Client Authority vs. Third-Party Protection
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A proposes a complex and costly hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by a specialized subconsultant to predict the extent to which sea level rise and the increased hydraulic capacity of the tidal crossing will result in flood damage to a neighborhood of twenty upstream homes during future high tides and storm surges, anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings.
Text references
Engineer A proposes a complex and costly hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by a specialized subconsultant to predict the extent to which sea level rise and the increased hydraulic capacity of the tidal crossing will result in flood damage to a neighborhood of twenty upstream homes during future high tides and storm surges, anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Competing_Public_Goods_Healthcare_Upstream_Community_Balanced_Advisory a proeth:CompetingPublicGoodsBalancedAdvisoryDisclosureObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Competing Public Goods Healthcare Upstream Community Balanced Advisory" ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Competing_Duties_—_Client_Authority_vs._Third-Party_Protection> ;
proeth:casecontext "Engineer A identified a conflict between the public benefit of a new healthcare facility and the upstream community flood risk, anticipating this to be a difficult question in public hearings." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.85" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Competing_Public_Goods_Balancing_Invoked_By_Engineer_A_Developer_vs_Upstream_Community ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:15:23.499283+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:15:23.499283+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Competing Public Goods Balanced Advisory Disclosure Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to explicitly acknowledge and address in any regulatory submission or advisory report the genuine conflict between the public benefit of the proposed healthcare facility — requiring the tidal crossing upgrade — and the welfare of the approximately twenty upstream homeowners facing accelerated flood risk and uninhabitability, presenting the tradeoffs completely and objectively so that the regulatory authority can make an informed decision." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A proposes a complex and costly hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by a specialized subconsultant to predict the extent to which sea level rise and the increased hydraulic capacity of the tidal crossing will result in flood damage to a neighborhood of twenty upstream homes during future high tides and storm surges, anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During preparation of regulatory submissions and public hearing materials" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A proposes a complex and costly hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by a specialized subconsultant to predict the extent to which sea level rise and the increased hydraulic capacity of the tidal crossing will result in flood damage to a neighborhood of twenty upstream homes during future high tides and storm surges, anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.064823"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:15:23.499283+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:15:23.499283+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.064823
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction