Engineer A Climate Impact Judgment Activation
S · State
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Climate_Impact_Judgment_Activation
Properties
Instance of
Climate-InformedDesignObligationActivationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Climate-InformedDesignObligationActivationState
Active period
From the point at which Engineer A formed a professional judgment that significant flooding impacts on third-party properties were reasonably likely, through the client engagement and disclosure discussions
Affected parties
Client B
Engineer A
General public
Regulatory agencies
Third-party residential property owners
Confidence
0.9
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's professional engagement on the coastal/tidal crossing project with Client B
Terminated by
Either Client B's agreement to commission detailed evaluation and disclosure, or Engineer A's withdrawal from the project
Triggering event
Engineer A's professional assessment that the project's hydraulic capacity increase creates sufficient potential for flooding of other properties to merit detailed, complex evaluation of future climate conditions
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A does have an ethical obligation to address the impacts of the project on public health, safety, and welfare regardless of whether or not that is required by applicable law
Text references
Engineer A does have an ethical obligation to address the impacts of the project on public health, safety, and welfare regardless of whether or not that is required by applicable law
Engineer A has an obligation to consider climate and weather changes in the future with respect to potential impacts on public health, safety, and welfare, where such impacts are reasonably likely and significant
Engineer A needs to have sufficient understanding of hydrology, hydraulics, and coastal modeling to form a reasonable judgment that there is sufficient potential for flooding of other properties to merit a detailed, complex evaluation of future conditions
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Climate_Impact_Judgment_Activation a proeth:Climate-InformedDesignObligationActivationState,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Climate Impact Judgment Activation" ;
proeth:activeperiod "From the point at which Engineer A formed a professional judgment that significant flooding impacts on third-party properties were reasonably likely, through the client engagement and disclosure discussions" ;
proeth:affectedparties "Client B",
"Engineer A",
"General public",
"Regulatory agencies",
"Third-party residential property owners" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "State" ;
proeth:confidence "0.9" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A does have an ethical obligation to address the impacts of the project on public health, safety, and welfare regardless of whether or not that is required by applicable law" ;
proeth:stateclass "Climate-Informed Design Obligation Activation State" ;
proeth:subject "Engineer A's professional engagement on the coastal/tidal crossing project with Client B" ;
proeth:terminatedby "Either Client B's agreement to commission detailed evaluation and disclosure, or Engineer A's withdrawal from the project" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A does have an ethical obligation to address the impacts of the project on public health, safety, and welfare regardless of whether or not that is required by applicable law",
"Engineer A has an obligation to consider climate and weather changes in the future with respect to potential impacts on public health, safety, and welfare, where such impacts are reasonably likely and significant",
"Engineer A needs to have sufficient understanding of hydrology, hydraulics, and coastal modeling to form a reasonable judgment that there is sufficient potential for flooding of other properties to merit a detailed, complex evaluation of future conditions",
"Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts" ;
proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's professional assessment that the project's hydraulic capacity increase creates sufficient potential for flooding of other properties to merit detailed, complex evaluation of future climate conditions" ;
proeth:urgencylevel "high" ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.060448"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:10:17.210310+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.060448
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction