Engineer A Client Risk Consequence Communication Client B Tidal Crossing
O · Obligation
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Engineer_A_Client_Risk_Consequence_Communication_Client_B_Tidal_Crossing
Properties
Instance of
ClientRiskConsequenceCommunicationObligation
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#ClientRiskConsequenceCommunicationObligation
Case context
Client B directed Engineer A to forgo the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis for cost reasons; Engineer A's faithful agent duty required communicating the consequences of that refusal to Client B.
Compliance status
unclear
Confidence
0.87
Importance
high
Obligated party
Engineer A
Obligation statement
Engineer A was obligated to communicate to Client B not only the public welfare rationale for the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis but also the specific professional, legal, and reputational risks to Client B of declining to authorize that analysis or the written documentation of the identified concern.
Temporal scope
During discussions with Client B about the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis
Relationships
defeasibleUnder
Client B Deferral of Third-Party Risk Analysis
derivedFromPrinciple
Faithful Agent Obligation With in Ethical Limits Invoked by BER Discussion Section
Source Evidence
Source text
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts.
Text references
Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix proeth-core: <http://proethica.org/ontology/core#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Engineer_A_Client_Risk_Consequence_Communication_Client_B_Tidal_Crossing a proeth:ClientRiskConsequenceCommunicationObligation,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Engineer A Client Risk Consequence Communication Client B Tidal Crossing" ;
proeth-core:competesWith case88:Engineer_A_Public_Welfare_Paramount_Gray_Area_Climate_Change_Tidal_Crossing ;
proeth-core:defeasibleUnder case88:Client_B_Deferral_of_Third-Party_Risk_Analysis ;
proeth:casecontext "Client B directed Engineer A to forgo the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis for cost reasons; Engineer A's faithful agent duty required communicating the consequences of that refusal to Client B." ;
proeth:compliancestatus "unclear" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Obligation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.87" ;
proeth:derivedFromPrinciple case88:Faithful_Agent_Obligation_Within_Ethical_Limits_Invoked_by_BER_Discussion_Section ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:obligatedparty "Engineer A" ;
proeth:obligationclass "Client Risk Consequence Communication Obligation" ;
proeth:obligationstatement "Engineer A was obligated to communicate to Client B not only the public welfare rationale for the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis but also the specific professional, legal, and reputational risks to Client B of declining to authorize that analysis or the written documentation of the identified concern." ;
proeth:sourcetext "Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts." ;
proeth:temporalscope "During discussions with Client B about the recommended specialized hydraulic analysis" ;
proeth:textreferences "Engineer A should engage Client B in discussions about the need for the detailed evaluation and disclosure of the potential impacts on the public and alternatives for the project to mitigate those impacts, and the potential risk to Client B of not evaluating the potential impacts." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.072583"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:21:20.043237+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.072583
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction