Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard Invoked for Tidal Crossing
P · Principle
Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Climate-Informed_Infrastructure_Design_Standard_Invoked_for_Tidal_Crossing
Properties
Instance of
Climate-InformedInfrastructureDesignStandard
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Climate-InformedInfrastructureDesignStandard
Applied to
Flood risk assessment for upstream neighborhood
Tidal crossing bridge replacement design
Balancing with
Client cost management directives
Regulatory compliance as ethical floor
Concrete expression
Engineer A must incorporate current scientific understanding of climate change — including updated precipitation data and sea level rise projections — into the tidal crossing bridge replacement design assessment, even where applicable regulatory standards have not yet been updated to require such incorporation
Confidence
0.92
Importance
high
Interpretation
The obligation to design to current climate science rather than outdated regulatory baselines is triggered when the engineer's professional judgment indicates that failure to do so may result in material harm to public safety or property
Invoked by
Engineer A Tidal Crossing Infrastructure Design Engineer
Tension resolution
Regulatory compliance based on outdated historical climate data is insufficient to discharge the public welfare obligation when current climate science indicates materially different future conditions
Source Evidence
Source text
Considering the effects of climate change in engineering planning and design adds substantial complexity to engineering decision-making as engineers consider 'going beyond' existing requirements to provide long-term protection of public health, safety, and welfare.
Text references
Considering the effects of climate change in engineering planning and design adds substantial complexity to engineering decision-making as engineers consider 'going beyond' existing requirements to provide long-term protection of public health, safety, and welfare.
The BER believes that Engineer A has an obligation to consider climate and weather changes in the future with respect to potential impacts on public health, safety, and welfare, where such impacts are reasonably likely and significant.
TTL
@prefix case88: <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#> .
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> .
@prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> .
@prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> .
@prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
case88:Climate-Informed_Infrastructure_Design_Standard_Invoked_for_Tidal_Crossing a proeth:Climate-InformedInfrastructureDesignStandard,
owl:NamedIndividual ;
rdfs:label "Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard Invoked for Tidal Crossing" ;
proeth:appliedto "Flood risk assessment for upstream neighborhood",
"Tidal crossing bridge replacement design" ;
proeth:balancingwith "Client cost management directives",
"Regulatory compliance as ethical floor" ;
proeth:conceptCategory "Principle" ;
proeth:concreteexpression "Engineer A must incorporate current scientific understanding of climate change — including updated precipitation data and sea level rise projections — into the tidal crossing bridge replacement design assessment, even where applicable regulatory standards have not yet been updated to require such incorporation" ;
proeth:confidence "0.92" ;
proeth:discoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:discoveredinpass "2" ;
proeth:discoveredinsection "discussion" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-26T00:19:27.254437+00:00" ;
proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ;
proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-26T00:19:27.254437+00:00" ;
proeth:importance "high" ;
proeth:interpretation "The obligation to design to current climate science rather than outdated regulatory baselines is triggered when the engineer's professional judgment indicates that failure to do so may result in material harm to public safety or property" ;
proeth:invokedby "Engineer A Tidal Crossing Infrastructure Design Engineer" ;
proeth:principleclass "Climate-Informed Infrastructure Design Standard" ;
proeth:sourcetext "Considering the effects of climate change in engineering planning and design adds substantial complexity to engineering decision-making as engineers consider 'going beyond' existing requirements to provide long-term protection of public health, safety, and welfare." ;
proeth:tensionresolution "Regulatory compliance based on outdated historical climate data is insufficient to discharge the public welfare obligation when current climate science indicates materially different future conditions" ;
proeth:textreferences "Considering the effects of climate change in engineering planning and design adds substantial complexity to engineering decision-making as engineers consider 'going beyond' existing requirements to provide long-term protection of public health, safety, and welfare.",
"The BER believes that Engineer A has an obligation to consider climate and weather changes in the future with respect to potential impacts on public health, safety, and welfare, where such impacts are reasonably likely and significant." ;
proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ;
prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-26T00:31:11.070788"^^xsd:dateTime ;
prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Extraction details
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
2
Discovered in section
discussion
First discovered
2026-02-26T00:19:27.254437+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-26T00:19:27.254437+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-26T00:31:11.070788
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction