Climate-Informed Design Obligation Activation — Tidal Crossing Upgrade

S · State Individual
http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Climate-Informed_Design_Obligation_Activation_—_Tidal_Crossing_Upgrade
Properties
Instance of
Climate-InformedDesignObligationActivationState
http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#Climate-InformedDesignObligationActivationState
Active period
From Engineer A's formation of professional judgment through resolution (analysis conducted, client informed, or Engineer A withdraws)
Affected parties
Client B
Engineer A
Regulatory authorities
Upstream homeowners
Confidence
0.96
Importance
high
Subject
Engineer A's professional judgment regarding the inadequacy of regulatory requirements for the tidal crossing project
Terminated by
Client B authorizing the specialized analysis, Engineer A disclosing risks to regulatory authorities, or Engineer A withdrawing from the project
Triggering event
Engineer A's determination, based on conference-presented hydraulic evaluation procedures, that regulatory compliance alone is insufficient to protect upstream homeowners under projected climate conditions
Urgency level
high
Source Evidence
Source text
It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case.

Text references
Engineer A proposes a complex and costly hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by a specialized subconsultant to predict the extent to which sea level rise and the increased hydraulic capacity of the tidal crossing will result in flood damage to a neighborhood of twenty upstream homes during future high tides and storm surges, anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings.
It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case.
TTL
@prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix proeth: <http://proethica.org/ontology/intermediate#> . @prefix prov: <http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . <http://proethica.org/ontology/case/88#Climate-Informed_Design_Obligation_Activation_—_Tidal_Crossing_Upgrade> a proeth:Climate-InformedDesignObligationActivationState, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Climate-Informed Design Obligation Activation — Tidal Crossing Upgrade" ; proeth:activeperiod "From Engineer A's formation of professional judgment through resolution (analysis conducted, client informed, or Engineer A withdraws)" ; proeth:affectedparties "Client B", "Engineer A", "Regulatory authorities", "Upstream homeowners" ; proeth:conceptCategory "State" ; proeth:confidence "0.96" ; proeth:discoveredincase "88" ; proeth:discoveredinpass "1" ; proeth:discoveredinsection "facts" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredat "2026-02-27T06:39:47.280651+00:00" ; proeth:firstdiscoveredincase "88" ; proeth:generatedattime "2026-02-27T06:39:47.280651+00:00" ; proeth:importance "high" ; proeth:sourcetext "It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case." ; proeth:stateclass "Climate-Informed Design Obligation Activation State" ; proeth:subject "Engineer A's professional judgment regarding the inadequacy of regulatory requirements for the tidal crossing project" ; proeth:terminatedby "Client B authorizing the specialized analysis, Engineer A disclosing risks to regulatory authorities, or Engineer A withdrawing from the project" ; proeth:textreferences "Engineer A proposes a complex and costly hydrologic and hydraulic analysis by a specialized subconsultant to predict the extent to which sea level rise and the increased hydraulic capacity of the tidal crossing will result in flood damage to a neighborhood of twenty upstream homes during future high tides and storm surges, anticipating this to be a difficult question to answer in the project's public hearings.", "It is Engineer A's judgment, based on hydraulic evaluation procedures presented at a recent transportation agency conference, that the proposed project may result in some upstream homes becoming uninhabitable a decade or more earlier than would otherwise be the case." ; proeth:triggeringevent "Engineer A's determination, based on conference-presented hydraulic evaluation procedures, that regulatory compliance alone is insufficient to protect upstream homeowners under projected climate conditions" ; proeth:urgencylevel "high" ; proeth:wasattributedto "Case 88 Extraction" ; prov:generatedAtTime "2026-02-28T10:32:26.860692"^^xsd:dateTime ; prov:wasGeneratedBy "ProEthica Case 88 Extraction" .
Metadata
Type
Individual
Last Updated
2026-05-28 16:26
Discovered in case
88
Discovered in pass
1
Discovered in section
facts
First discovered
2026-02-27T06:39:47.280651+00:00
First case
88
Generated
2026-02-27T06:39:47.280651+00:00
Attributed to
Case 88 Extraction
Generated
2026-02-28T10:32:26.860692
Generated by
ProEthica Case 88 Extraction